1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-1882(97)84108-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic model of crossflow microfiltration in flat-channel systems under laminar flow conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although blocking models were derived for dead-end filtration system, the effect of hydraulic shear generated by the very low CFV applied in this study was considered negligible therefore, these models are applied to assess dynamic filtration development and performance. Geissler and Werner [25] observed in fact that at low CFV the behaviour of fouling resistance in both crossflow filtration and dead-end filtration was similar under similar operational conditions for conventional membranes.…”
Section: Filtration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although blocking models were derived for dead-end filtration system, the effect of hydraulic shear generated by the very low CFV applied in this study was considered negligible therefore, these models are applied to assess dynamic filtration development and performance. Geissler and Werner [25] observed in fact that at low CFV the behaviour of fouling resistance in both crossflow filtration and dead-end filtration was similar under similar operational conditions for conventional membranes.…”
Section: Filtration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One of the six forces mentioned previously will however change along the channel length. As water permeates the initial sections of the membrane the pressure within the channel slightly drops leading to a lower driving force for permeation and thus lower permeate drag forces in subsequent stages of the channel (Geissler and Werner 1995). This permeate drag gradient could result in a gradient in initial bacterial adhesion, with a high concentration of bacteria at the inlet and a lower adhesion at the outlet.…”
Section: Subramani Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where o is the pure fluid viscosity, the suspension solids volume fraction, and¯ ( ) is determined using the relation given by Geissler and Werner [40], Table 1 Physical properties of the yeast suspension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%