2011
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2010.545159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Modeling and a Parametric Study of an Indirect Solar Cabinet Dryer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this period, the solar radiation is zero but the outflow exergy of the collector has a larger value than that of the inflow exergy. In fact, as can be seen in the experimental study of Mohanraj and Chandrasekar [14] and also in the developed model of Sami et al [1], a solid packing as storage materials was used below the absorber plate, and the stored energy during the day could be transferred to the flowing air through the night. The use of the solar collector with storage materials by Mohanraj and Chandrasekar [14] seems to be a good idea.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this period, the solar radiation is zero but the outflow exergy of the collector has a larger value than that of the inflow exergy. In fact, as can be seen in the experimental study of Mohanraj and Chandrasekar [14] and also in the developed model of Sami et al [1], a solid packing as storage materials was used below the absorber plate, and the stored energy during the day could be transferred to the flowing air through the night. The use of the solar collector with storage materials by Mohanraj and Chandrasekar [14] seems to be a good idea.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our previous presented model [1], for performance analysis of a cabinet solar dryer was verified by using the experimental data reported by Dissa et al [15] and Mohanraj and Chandrasekar, [14]. In order to examine the capability of the model, the calculated values of the different parameters were compared with the corresponding experimental ones.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations