2018
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2018.2843177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Modeling and Control of High-Speed Automated Vehicles for Lane Change Maneuver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In implementations on full size vehicles, real-time operation with longer planning horizons has been achieved by using MPC to compute the optimal steering inputs only after the longitudinal inputs are determined by another means. Liu et al perform lane change maneuvers by first computing a velocity profile that will place the vehicle in a gap in traffic before performing the lane change with a steering only MPC [15]. In the approaches of Funke et al [16] and Gutjahr et al [17], the vehicle tracks a desired velocity profile while avoiding obstacles using steering only.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In implementations on full size vehicles, real-time operation with longer planning horizons has been achieved by using MPC to compute the optimal steering inputs only after the longitudinal inputs are determined by another means. Liu et al perform lane change maneuvers by first computing a velocity profile that will place the vehicle in a gap in traffic before performing the lane change with a steering only MPC [15]. In the approaches of Funke et al [16] and Gutjahr et al [17], the vehicle tracks a desired velocity profile while avoiding obstacles using steering only.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the trajectory planning methods, current studies mainly contain two kinds of models [12], [13]. Some research tends to consider higher-level planning that considers longitudinal velocity change [14]- [16] while neglecting a vehicle's dynamic characteristics.…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Review and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited by the local shapes of interpolated curves, it is easy for the planner to get into trouble when the vehicle is close to the surrounding obstacles, which we call it a near-obstacle planning trouble, as is shown in Figure 1. For the path tracking and lateral stability controller, some advanced control methods have been developed, such as pure pursuit tracking control and model predictive control [20,21], robust control [22][23][24], fuzzy control [25], sliding mode control [26][27][28], adaptive control [28,29], non-smooth control [30], disturbance decoupling control [31], other nonlinear control [32], which have shown promising perspective in vehicle engineering application. In this study, we consider that our main objective tends to develop trajectory planning technique for on-road autonomous driving, hence the path tracking control is simplified, we employ a modified pure pursuit tracking controller for forward simulation to obtain a feasible control sequence of the vehicle and further smooth the path simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%