2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling and parameter identification for a gantry-type automated fiber placement machine combined with hydraulic balance system and nonlinear friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, repeated tension fluctuations increase the probability of wire blocking, which can lead to placement failure. A stable tension can reduce laying defects and the likelihood of laying failures, thus enhancing the quality of the laying [7,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, repeated tension fluctuations increase the probability of wire blocking, which can lead to placement failure. A stable tension can reduce laying defects and the likelihood of laying failures, thus enhancing the quality of the laying [7,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 18. Torque prediction based on identified dynamic parameters5.2 Comparative analysis of the HED model performanceIn order to validate the rationality of the HED model proposed in this paper, a comparative analysis is conducted with the model presented in the literature[31]. The results, depicted in Fig.18from top to bottom, include the positions, velocities, accelerations of joint 2, as well as the joint torques and the output torques of the hydraulic equilibrium system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results, depicted in Fig.18from top to bottom, include the positions, velocities, accelerations of joint 2, as well as the joint torques and the output torques of the hydraulic equilibrium system. Through comparison, residual errors of the proposed model and the compared model from the literature[31] are determined to be 4187.255 Nm and 5870.693 Nm, respectively, as shown in Table5. The torque error of joint 2 based on the HED model is reduced by 28.68%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%