2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-79111-1_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of Sliding Mode Control for a Cable Driven Parallel Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A system of ropes coiled on pulleys controls the height of the habitat modulus, the trim during motion, and lowering and climbing. Because of their advantageous high strength/mass ratio, flexibles are frequently used in aeronautical systems [16,17]. The pulley system that makes up the open ring control has a changeable radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A system of ropes coiled on pulleys controls the height of the habitat modulus, the trim during motion, and lowering and climbing. Because of their advantageous high strength/mass ratio, flexibles are frequently used in aeronautical systems [16,17]. The pulley system that makes up the open ring control has a changeable radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vantilt presented a model-based control method to compensate for the exoskeleton dynamics, which relied on modeling the full exoskeleton dynamics and the contacts with the environment [14]. Inel used sliding model control to follow the desired trajectories, an accurate dynamics model of a cable-driven robot was still needed [15]. However, controlled objects usually have the problems of disturbance and parameter errors; thus, it is difficult to obtain an accurate dynamic model in the actual exoskeleton system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the next sampling time, the prediction horizon moves one step forward, and the optimization problem is repeated iteratively. However, the above-mentioned problem becomes more difficult, or even impossible to solve, when it is implemented for nonlinear systems with fast dynamics, especially in the case where several constraints are considered, such as that proposed by Inel et al in [16] or by Carbone et al in [17]. This is because the on-line nonlinear optimization algorithm imposes a heavy computational burden which requires a large computation time, as reported, for example, by Tang and Shao in [18], by Li et al in [19], or by Poignet and Gautier in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%