MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2008.4753058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling of Optical Phased Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the limits of the system, measurements at angular scan rates up to 1 mrad/s were performed at one of the pointing angles. The accuracy of this investigation suffered from the need to capture images for the different beams during different scans combined with the effects of angle-scan-rate-dependent loss for OPA steering [5]. Nevertheless, the results were similar to those for the 0.25 mrad/s measurements: CBC efficiency was consistently slightly higher when tracking a moving remote terminal, although the difference was within measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Coherent Beam Combining Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…To test the limits of the system, measurements at angular scan rates up to 1 mrad/s were performed at one of the pointing angles. The accuracy of this investigation suffered from the need to capture images for the different beams during different scans combined with the effects of angle-scan-rate-dependent loss for OPA steering [5]. Nevertheless, the results were similar to those for the 0.25 mrad/s measurements: CBC efficiency was consistently slightly higher when tracking a moving remote terminal, although the difference was within measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Coherent Beam Combining Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 71%