2009
DOI: 10.3384/ecp09430021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Modelling of CO2-removal units for an IGCC power plant

Abstract: This article describes dynamic models of the carbon dioxide (CO 2)-removal units which are coupled with conventional models to form a complete model of an IGCC power plant with CO 2 capture. Therefore some components of the Modelica_Fluid 1.0 library and packages of the Modelica.Media library from Modelica 3.0 were used. Not yet available components were developed. The results obtained with Dymola 7.1 were compared with steady state simulations calculated with other tools (ChemCAD and Aspen Plus) and a very go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heil et al developed a dynamic model for a pre-combustion CO 2 removal unit utilizing methanol as solvent in an equilibrium-based absorber column model. The thermophysical properties of the fluid mixtures involved in the process are modelled with a simplistic approach (Heil et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heil et al developed a dynamic model for a pre-combustion CO 2 removal unit utilizing methanol as solvent in an equilibrium-based absorber column model. The thermophysical properties of the fluid mixtures involved in the process are modelled with a simplistic approach (Heil et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A selective H 2 S removal configuration was used in the simulation. In this configuration, the raw syngas feeds up the main absorber in which CH 3 OH absorbs most of the impurities produced in gasification process such as CO 2 , H 2 S, COS, HCN and NH 3 [29]. Thereafter, the solvent passes through a regeneration process, where these components are desorbed by reducing the pressure, stripping and/or boiling up the solvent.…”
Section: Process Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a decent amount of literature dealing with the dynamic behavior of each sub-unit separately including valuable studies that have shed light in the non-steady operation of ASU [13][14][15], gasification [16][17][18][19][20][21], acid gas removal [22][23][24] and FT synthesis [25][26][27], the plant-wide control of such an integrated configuration that investigates the dynamic interaction among the sub-units during feedstock/load variations has not been attempted yet. One of the most common software platforms that are employed to perform the dynamic simulations of such chemical processes is Aspen Plus Dynamics (APD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%