2022
DOI: 10.1080/00051144.2022.2145697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modelling of parafoil system based on aerodynamic coefficients identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, factors such as structural design complexity and trim considerations should be taken into account, favoring airfoils with greater thickness and lower moment coefficients [32]. Preliminary screening of airfoils in the Profili airfoil database is conducted within the thickness range of 10% to 14% and camber range of 3% to 8% under a Reynolds number of 300,000 [33]. Among the selected candidates, including MH115, SD-7032-099-88, E214, Eppler67, and FX63-110, a detailed comparison is carried out regarding polar curves, lift-to-drag ratios, drag coefficients, and moment coefficients.…”
Section: Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, factors such as structural design complexity and trim considerations should be taken into account, favoring airfoils with greater thickness and lower moment coefficients [32]. Preliminary screening of airfoils in the Profili airfoil database is conducted within the thickness range of 10% to 14% and camber range of 3% to 8% under a Reynolds number of 300,000 [33]. Among the selected candidates, including MH115, SD-7032-099-88, E214, Eppler67, and FX63-110, a detailed comparison is carried out regarding polar curves, lift-to-drag ratios, drag coefficients, and moment coefficients.…”
Section: Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%