2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.628.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Monitoring and Seismic Response of a Historic Masonry Tower

Abstract: After the Italian earthquakes of May 2012, an extensive research program had been performed to assess the state of preservation of the tallest historic tower in Mantua, Italy. Subsequently, a continuous dynamic monitoring system was installed in the tower, with seismic and structural health monitoring purposes. After a brief description of the investigated tower and its state of preservation, the paper summarizes some results of the long-term dynamic monitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curves in Figure 13a confirm that, like in Figure 12a, the bell lasts in ringing right state over time; on the contrary, curves in Figure 13b show that, after some cycles, three in that case, the ringing state switches from wrong to right. In the figures, impacts obviously correspond to sudden variations, whose extents, recalling Equation (23) or (24), are inverse function of the adopted time step.…”
Section: Large Undamped Free Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Curves in Figure 13a confirm that, like in Figure 12a, the bell lasts in ringing right state over time; on the contrary, curves in Figure 13b show that, after some cycles, three in that case, the ringing state switches from wrong to right. In the figures, impacts obviously correspond to sudden variations, whose extents, recalling Equation (23) or (24), are inverse function of the adopted time step.…”
Section: Large Undamped Free Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inertia forces due to the swinging of the bell play a crucial role in dynamic identification [19] or assessment of existing bell towers [8][9][10][11][12][13][20][21][22][23][24][25], especially when the frequency of the bell oscillations is in the neighborhood of the relevant natural frequencies of the tower. Some analytical solutions for bell-tower interaction are given in [13], considering free oscillations and different mounting systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-designed monitoring system could identify premature failures and prevent sudden collapses. Available traditional SHM systems for masonry structures are based on the evaluation of changes or anomalies in the structural behavior or in the modal properties of the structure, signs of a variation of stiffness or developments of crack patterns [10,11]. The reliability of these techniques depends on the number, the deployment and performance of each sensor.…”
Section: State-of-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In long-term vibration-based monitoring, a technique widely applied to historical structures as it involves the use of a limited number of sensors, anomalies in the global structural behavior are detected from the evaluation of changes in modal features, such us natural frequencies, caused by local modifications in structural stiffness occurred during the development of crack patterns. [7][8][9] Static parameters-based methods are employed to detect and assess local propagation and evolution of cracks and damages considering displacements, tilts, and strain measurements acquired using dedicated sensors, such as linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs), inclinometers, and resistive strain gauges (RSGs). 10 These approaches have the advantages of tracking local damages, even when they are not sufficiently severe to influence modal features, therefore overcoming a limit that affects dynamic monitoring systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%