2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-021-1960-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic multi-objective intelligent optimal control toward wastewater treatment processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in practice, controllers usually require the ability to concurrently achieve multiple performance indices that often conflict. Thus, multiobjective (MO) control designs to simultaneously achieve multiple objectives have been proposed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In general, MO controller problems (MOCP) can be classified into two classes: MOCPs with functional constraints and MOCPs with dynamical system constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, controllers usually require the ability to concurrently achieve multiple performance indices that often conflict. Thus, multiobjective (MO) control designs to simultaneously achieve multiple objectives have been proposed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In general, MO controller problems (MOCP) can be classified into two classes: MOCPs with functional constraints and MOCPs with dynamical system constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, many researchers proposed some multivariable control methods. [18][19][20] For the multivariable control of WWTP, Qiao et al 21 proposed a robust PID controller method, which used genetic algorithm to solve robustness-constrained optimization problems, and this method can realize the control of DO concentration and substrate concentration under various disturbances. However, because of the time-varying characteristic of the WWTP model and the uncertainty of the reaction process, there are some problems when using PID control method, such as poor modeling accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%