2017
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic multiscale method for gas‐solid flow via spatiotemporal coupling of two‐fluid model and discrete particle model

Abstract: Various computational fluid dynamics methods have been developed to study the hydrodynamics of gas‐solid flows, however, none of those methods is suitable for all the problems encountered due to the inherent multiscale characteristics of gas‐solid flows. Both discrete particle model (DPM) and two‐fluid model (TFM) have been widely used to study gas‐solid flows, DPM is accurate but computationally expensive, whereas TFM is computationally efficient but its deficiency is the lack of reliable constitutive relatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the EE approach, it will difficult to give an accurate prediction when Kn number of particle phase is large, because EE approach cannot capture non-equilibrium physics of solid particles, such as particle trajectory crossing (PTC) phenomenon [2,34]. Based on the features of EE and EL approach, many studies focus on the hybrid method, coupling Eulerian and Lagrangian approach together for solid particle phase, to maintain both the accuracy and computation efficiency [40,6,64,38]. In the hybrid method, it is a challenge to define an accurate and reliable criterion for the smooth transition between the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches for disperse phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the EE approach, it will difficult to give an accurate prediction when Kn number of particle phase is large, because EE approach cannot capture non-equilibrium physics of solid particles, such as particle trajectory crossing (PTC) phenomenon [2,34]. Based on the features of EE and EL approach, many studies focus on the hybrid method, coupling Eulerian and Lagrangian approach together for solid particle phase, to maintain both the accuracy and computation efficiency [40,6,64,38]. In the hybrid method, it is a challenge to define an accurate and reliable criterion for the smooth transition between the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches for disperse phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%