1993
DOI: 10.1080/01418619308224770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic observations of dislocation generation at grain boundaries in ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to explain these data is that the modification of grain boundary topology via grain boundary migration (GBM) could be more widespread at a warmer temperature, which could obscure evidence of the additional process responsible for a weaker CPO in smaller grains. The interaction of GBS with dislocation processes and GBM is developed a little in the ice literature (Hondoh and Higashi, 1983;Liu et al, 1993Liu et al, , 1995Duval, 1985;Faria et al, 2014), and experiments that show offsets of grain boundaries whilst GBM occurs (Drury and Humphreys, 1988;Ree, 1994) suggest that GBS may not leave a clear microstructural signal when GBS and GBM coexist. There are two candidate processes that may explain weakening of CPO in smaller grains and the lack of rational crys-tallographic misorientation axes of small grains relative to each other or to larger grains.…”
Section: Cpo Development: Differences Related To Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to explain these data is that the modification of grain boundary topology via grain boundary migration (GBM) could be more widespread at a warmer temperature, which could obscure evidence of the additional process responsible for a weaker CPO in smaller grains. The interaction of GBS with dislocation processes and GBM is developed a little in the ice literature (Hondoh and Higashi, 1983;Liu et al, 1993Liu et al, , 1995Duval, 1985;Faria et al, 2014), and experiments that show offsets of grain boundaries whilst GBM occurs (Drury and Humphreys, 1988;Ree, 1994) suggest that GBS may not leave a clear microstructural signal when GBS and GBM coexist. There are two candidate processes that may explain weakening of CPO in smaller grains and the lack of rational crys-tallographic misorientation axes of small grains relative to each other or to larger grains.…”
Section: Cpo Development: Differences Related To Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain localization features observed in our experiments can be explained by the fact that only dislocation glide in the basal plane contributes to the deformation [3, 191. The lattice dislocations generated at the grain boundary [20] move under the resolved shear stress parallel to the basal plane. Dislocations of the same sign move in a direction which depends on the sign of the resolved shear stress, whereas under the same resolved shear stress dislocations of opposite signs move in opposite directions (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain boundary dislocation emission occurs before the dislocation multiplication mechanisms observed in single crystal ice can operate. Liu and colleagues (Jia et al, 1996;Liu et al, 1992bLiu et al, , 1993Liu et al, , 1995b showed three different deformation situations are possible in polycrystals. First, for grains and grain boundaries that are not oriented in any special relationships with respect to the loading direction, screw and 60°F ig.…”
Section: Synchrotron X-ray Topographymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Liu and co-workers (Jia et al, 1996;Liu et al, 1992bLiu et al, , 1993Liu et al, , 1995a are the only researchers to have used SWBXT to study polycrystalline ice. They used in-situ straining to demonstrate that grain boundary regions always deform before the grain interiors.…”
Section: Synchrotron X-ray Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%