2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-012-4475-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic optimal strategy for monitoring disease recurrence

Abstract: Surveillance to detect cancer recurrence is an important part of care for cancer survivors. In this paper we discuss the design of optimal strategies for early detection of disease recurrence based on each patient's distinct biomarker trajectory and periodically updated risk estimated in the setting of a prospective cohort study. We adopt a latent class joint model which considers a longitudinal biomarker process and an event process jointly, to address heterogeneity of patients and disease, to discover distin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, epidemic models have attracted much attention [14], especially, avian influenza model. The study of our work tries to describe the spreading process of the disease, and encourages people to take good strategies to prevent the avian influenza virus from transmitting to human world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, epidemic models have attracted much attention [14], especially, avian influenza model. The study of our work tries to describe the spreading process of the disease, and encourages people to take good strategies to prevent the avian influenza virus from transmitting to human world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By recommending less frequent testing for patients who are at low risk of progression or unlikely to benefit from treatment, the framework can reduce patients' financial burden and optimize health care resource utilization. 51 Previous approaches for dynamically updating surveillance schedules have either optimized timing at the population level 16 ; individualized timing by considering only predicted risk of progression, ignoring health and cost outcomes 18,19 ; or not incorporated patient history. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Our approach dynamically individualizes timing by embedding predictions within a comprehensive decisionmaking framework to optimize outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous approaches for dynamically updating surveillance schedules have either optimized timing at the population level 16 ; individualized timing by considering only predicted risk of progression, ignoring health and cost outcomes 18,19 ; or not incorporated patient history. 2227 Our approach dynamically individualizes timing by embedding predictions within a comprehensive decision-making framework to optimize outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such individualized predictive tools based on JM are valuable in clinical settings for patient monitoring and decision making because such predictions can be dynamically updated according to the observations of biomarkers ( 83 , 85 , 86 ). Availability of free software ( 18 , 44 ) and a web-based calculator ( 86 ) implementing such algorithms should facilitate the growing use of this methodology in practical applications.…”
Section: Approaches To Joint Analyses Of Longitudinal and Time-to-evementioning
confidence: 99%