1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00229319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic organization of primary motor cortex output to target muscles in adult rats II. Rapid reorganization following motor nerve lesions

Abstract: In the accompanying paper (Sanes et al. 1989), we demonstrated that the map of motor cortex (MI) output was reorganized when examined 1 week to 4 months after a motor nerve lesion in adult rats. The present experiments measured the extent of functional reorganization that occurs within the first hours after this lesion. Shifts in MI output were examined by testing the effect of stimulation at a site in MI vibrissa area before and up to 10 h after nerve section of the branches of the facial nerve that innervate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
1
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
130
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In adult macaque monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and prosimian galagos studied years after a therapeutic amputation of a limb after injuries as infants, juveniles, or adults, microstimulation of the territories in M1 of the missing limb evoked movements of the limb stump and adjoining shoulder or trunk at threshold current levels comparable to those for evoked movements in normal primates (15,27,28). Similar results have been obtained in rats (29). Thus, regardless of the age at which the amputation occurs, the deprived portion of motor cortex does not remain nonfunctional but instead mediates new muscle movements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In adult macaque monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and prosimian galagos studied years after a therapeutic amputation of a limb after injuries as infants, juveniles, or adults, microstimulation of the territories in M1 of the missing limb evoked movements of the limb stump and adjoining shoulder or trunk at threshold current levels comparable to those for evoked movements in normal primates (15,27,28). Similar results have been obtained in rats (29). Thus, regardless of the age at which the amputation occurs, the deprived portion of motor cortex does not remain nonfunctional but instead mediates new muscle movements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The areas are adjacent, and so can be easily studied in vitro in the same slice at the same time, yet they are distinct in both lamination and in function. Synaptic modifications demonstrable in vitro may be involved in cortical functions and reorganization in vivo, and both somatosensory and motor areas of the adult rat can reorganize in response to central or peripheral manipulations (Donoghue et al, 1990;Castro-Alamancos et al, 1992;Recanzone et al, 1992;Diamond et al, 1993). Our results show that while motor and somatosensory cortex can express a variety of types of synaptic plasticity, they are not identical in their capabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The total areal extent of individual forelimb and vibrissa representations was determined with image analysis software (N IH Image, version 1.61) by analyzing identically scaled images of each map. Only the areal extents of the vibrissa and forelimb representations were determined, because: (1) it was expected that vibrissa trimming could affect the size of the vibrissa representation; (2) the forelimb representation shares the longest, common border with the vibrissa representation in comparison with any other neighboring M1 representation; and (3) there is previous evidence that the position of the forelimb -vibrissa border can change under a variety of peripheral manipulations (e.g., Donoghue et al, 1990;Sanes et al, 1992), thus leading to the possibility of reciprocal changes in size of both representations. For each group, the resulting sizes of individual forelimb and vibrissa representations for each animal comprising that group were used for two types of analysis: (1) within-group comparisons between the left experimental hemisphere (defined as M1 contralateral to the trimmed vibrissae) and the right hemisphere (defined as M1 ipsilateral to the trimmed vibrissae), in which statistically significant differences in mean size were determined using paired Student's t tests (level of significance, p Ͻ 0.05); and (2) across-group comparisons between left experimental hemispheres or right hemispheres, in which statistically significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA and a Scheffé's post hoc test (level of significance, p Ͻ 0.05).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%