2019
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amz040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Paths of Complexity and Accuracy in Second Language Speech: A Longitudinal Case Study of Chinese Learners

Abstract: The present study investigated the developmental patterns of Chinese EFL(AQ) learners’ oral language in terms of complexity and accuracy and looked into the dynamic interactions between them within the framework of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). The data were analysed using dynamic analyses (moving min–max graphs, moving correlations and Monte Carlo Simulations). It was found that, firstly, at the group level, the general developmental trends of both complexity and accuracy showed improvements. Secondl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed differences between the oral and written L2 data are a relatively novel finding, as there are only very few microdevelopment studies looking into the effects of mode (see, e.g., Chan et al., 2015; Larsen–Freeman, 2006; Yu & Lowie, 2019). Partial support was found for the hypothesis that measures of complexity, fluency, accuracy, and lexical richness are significantly greater in speaking than in writing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The observed differences between the oral and written L2 data are a relatively novel finding, as there are only very few microdevelopment studies looking into the effects of mode (see, e.g., Chan et al., 2015; Larsen–Freeman, 2006; Yu & Lowie, 2019). Partial support was found for the hypothesis that measures of complexity, fluency, accuracy, and lexical richness are significantly greater in speaking than in writing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In order to disentangle the relationship between cognitive capacities and specific domains of L2 proficiency, we assessed receptive as well as productive oral and written L2 skills, including both lexical and morphosyntactic features, and—within the productive domain—extracted measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF), which, from the perspective of CDST, typify the three subsystems of the language system (Yu & Lowie, 2020). This yielded a total of seven measures of L2 proficiency (see Table 3).…”
Section: This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, emergentist accounts of second language development warrant greater attention to the dynamic interaction of multiple constructs. Such dynamic interaction analysis has surfaced in a handful of complexity-informed studies (e.g., Hepford, 2017;Evans, 2019;Yu and Lowie, 2019) and has offered insight into the ways in which linguistic constructs come together to both support or constrain development (van Geert, 1994).…”
Section: Complex Dynamic Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%