2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Performance of a 3D Re-entrant Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Christensen's (2008) studies found that the yield stresses computed from the 0.2% offset rule deviated from the actual yield stress at a point where nonlinearity can be graphically observed. Furthermore, according to a finding by Logakannan et al (2020), the stresses in dynamic testing (vibration test) were notably higher than those from quasi-static loading possibly due to insufficient time to deform as opposed to quasi-static test.…”
Section: Part 1: Static Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Christensen's (2008) studies found that the yield stresses computed from the 0.2% offset rule deviated from the actual yield stress at a point where nonlinearity can be graphically observed. Furthermore, according to a finding by Logakannan et al (2020), the stresses in dynamic testing (vibration test) were notably higher than those from quasi-static loading possibly due to insufficient time to deform as opposed to quasi-static test.…”
Section: Part 1: Static Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Compressive performance of the 3D novel tetrahedral lattice materials compared with those well‐known materials. [ 29–35 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive performance of the 3D novel tetrahedral lattice materials compared with those well-known materials. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] performance and relatively reasonable density than those of other lattice materials. It is worth noting that the novel 3D tetrahedral lattice materials cover a rational density range with prominent strength, which may offer promising applications in various fields.…”
Section: Comparison Of 3d Tetrahedral Lattice Materials With Other Ce...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ashby chart for the proposed structure compared with other structures: foams made of aluminum, 33 polymer, 34 zinc, 35 steel 36 ; honeycombs based on aluminum, 37 steel 38 ; Graded auxetic structure 39 ; 2D and 3D re-entrant structure 23,40 ; 2D and 3D re-entrant chiral structure, 3,41 and steel tubes. 1 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, unlike the common energy absorption structures, the initial peak crushing force is almost flat. Since the energy absorption properties can be controlled by changing the geometric parameters, the Graded auxetic structure 39 ; 2D and 3D re-entrant structure 23,40 ; 2D and 3D re-entrant chiral structure, 3,41 and steel tubes. 1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%