2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic performance of concrete undercut anchors for Nuclear Power Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, restricting the load cycling frequency in anchor prequalification tests to preclude inertial effects, for example, to below 0.5 Hz, produces more consistent displacement results. A similar conclusion and recommendation for restricting load and crack cycling frequencies was proposed by Mahrenholtz [28]. In summary, dynamic effects may conservatively be excluded from anchor qualification testing.…”
Section: Requirements For a Comprehensive Seismic Anchorage Qualifsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, restricting the load cycling frequency in anchor prequalification tests to preclude inertial effects, for example, to below 0.5 Hz, produces more consistent displacement results. A similar conclusion and recommendation for restricting load and crack cycling frequencies was proposed by Mahrenholtz [28]. In summary, dynamic effects may conservatively be excluded from anchor qualification testing.…”
Section: Requirements For a Comprehensive Seismic Anchorage Qualifsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The cyclic tests were run load-controlled at quasi-static frequencies of about 0.2 Hz. It has been shown that this loading rate is appropriate for simulated seismic anchor tests 13,31,32 . For cyclic tension tests, the servo control program consisted of sinusoidal load cycles in which the minimum load level was 0.1 kN (22 lbf) to avoid control problems due to slackness between anchor nut and slab.…”
Section: Experimental Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of parameters, including concrete cone failure, concrete splitting, anchor rod pullout, and anchor bolt failure, were investigated. Several such studies were reviewed in the literature. Other parameters, which were also considered in this paper, include the behavior of fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) strips used to strengthen some of the tested specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%