2016
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Procurement under Uncertainty: Optimal Design and Implications for Incomplete Contracts

Abstract: International audienceWe characterize the optimal dynamic contract for a long-term basic service when an uncertain add-on is required later on. Introducing firm risk aversion has two impacts. Profits for the basic service can be backloaded to induce cheaper information revelation for this service: an Income Effect which reduces output distortions. The firm must also bear some risk to induce information revelation for the add-on. This Risk Effect reduces the level of the add-on but hardens information revelatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the relationship is between a buyer and only one supplier, the question of variety of approaches does not arise. This is also true for the related work by Arve and Martimort (2016), who study risk-sharing considerations in the design of contracts with ex post adaptation. Additionally, Ding and Wolfstetter (2011) consider a case where a supplier can choose to bypass the contest and negotiate with the buyer directly in an environment where innovation quality is obtained by expending costly effort.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Since the relationship is between a buyer and only one supplier, the question of variety of approaches does not arise. This is also true for the related work by Arve and Martimort (2016), who study risk-sharing considerations in the design of contracts with ex post adaptation. Additionally, Ding and Wolfstetter (2011) consider a case where a supplier can choose to bypass the contest and negotiate with the buyer directly in an environment where innovation quality is obtained by expending costly effort.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 83%
“…The project, whose technical and functional features are clearly de…ned and veri…able, requires a sunk investment of I and then a …xed O&M cost per unit of time (say, per annum) denoted as c. For technical convenience, we assume that construction can be instantaneously carried out, that the infrastructure has an in…nite life and that, once implemented, the project will provide a perpetuity of annual public non-…nancial bene…ts, valued at b, above and beyond those accruing to direct users. 3 We shall assume that the government (she) is able to commit at time t = 0 to a takeit-or-leave-it contract o¤er to a …rm (he), having no outside option, including the following terms and conditions. 4 First, the contract gives the …rm the responsibility for building the facility at the time foreseen by the government and then maintaining and operating it all along the contract period which is assumed to be long enough to be approximated as in…nite.…”
Section: Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We assume that the government, having identified a potential private partner (a firm or consortium), can commit to a take-it-or-leave-it offer including the following terms. 2 First, the agreement, signed at t = 0, gives the contractor the responsibility for financing and building the infrastructure as well as the obligation for effectively operating and maintaining the facility all along the contract period which is assumed to be long enough to be approximated as infinite.…”
Section: The Model 31 Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In toll roads, for instance, positive externalities (e.g., emissions abatement by increased traffic fluidity) increase with the traffic diverted from the existing roads, which in turn influences the amount of toll revenues. However, as long the process governing the project's spillovers is public information, we can generalize our model to allow for this 2. We assume that the agent has no outside opportunity and, thus, its reservation utility is equal to zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%