“…The measures are most often expressed in terms of force-motion relations at the driving-point, namely, mechanical impedance, apparent mass and absorbed power, and flow of vibration through the body, such as seat-to-head and body segments vibration transmissibility. The measured biodynamic responses have been used to identify mechanical-equivalent properties of the exposed human body and critical frequency ranges associated with resonances of different body segments (e.g., Coermann, 1962;Suggs et al, 1969;Mertens, 1978;Dupuis and Zerlett, 1986;Panjabi et al, 1986;Sandover 1988;Donati and Bonthoux, 1983;El-Khatib et al, 1998) to understand the potential injury mechanisms (e.g., Liu et al, 1998;Hinz et al, 2002;Magnusson et al, 1993) and for deriving frequency-weightings for exposure assessments (e.g., Meister et al, 1984;Mansfield and Griffin, 1998a;Holmlund, 1998a, Rakheja et al, 2008), and to help developing and validating continuum and discrete distributed-parameter models (e.g., Von Gierke and Coermann, 1963;Suggs et al, 1969;Fairley and Griffin, 1989;Mertens, 1978;Fritz, 2005;Pankoke et al, 2001). These biodynamic models can be further used to help quantify and understand the distributed joint forces, tissue stresses, and strains that may be directly related to the vibration-induced injury and disorder mechanisms (e.g., Fritz 2000;Pankoke et al, 2001;Hinz et al, 2002), to help design better seats and anti-vibration systems (e.g., Stein and Múča, 2003;Paplukopoulos and Natsivas, 2007;Kruczek and Stribrsky, 2004;Rakheja et al, 2002a;Kerr, 1998;Sachse et al, 2003;Pernica, 1990;Ippili et al, 2008;…”