2016
DOI: 10.1177/2331216516630549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Abstract: Dynamic range compression serves different purposes in the music and hearing-aid industries. In the music industry, it is used to make music louder and more attractive to normal-hearing listeners. In the hearing-aid industry, it is used to map the variable dynamic range of acoustic signals to the reduced dynamic range of hearing-impaired listeners. Hence, hearing-aided listeners will typically receive a dual dose of compression when listening to recorded music. The present study involved an acoustic analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the present results, the use of slow compression seems to be a “safe” option for music listening because several subjects showed relatively clear preferences for SLOW, while none showed a clear preference for FAST. This is consistent with the finding of Kirchberger and Russo (2016) that the quality of prerecorded music was rated higher when it was subjected to linear amplification than when it was subjected to fast-acting compression, as slow-acting compression is similar to linear amplification over short time scales. Thus, it seems reasonable to use slow compression as the default option for a “music” program in a hearing aid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Based on the present results, the use of slow compression seems to be a “safe” option for music listening because several subjects showed relatively clear preferences for SLOW, while none showed a clear preference for FAST. This is consistent with the finding of Kirchberger and Russo (2016) that the quality of prerecorded music was rated higher when it was subjected to linear amplification than when it was subjected to fast-acting compression, as slow-acting compression is similar to linear amplification over short time scales. Thus, it seems reasonable to use slow compression as the default option for a “music” program in a hearing aid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This finding made sense, as analog HAs provide mostly linear amplification. Linear or linear-like amplification has been found to improve music listening compared to the WDRC commonly provided in today's digital HAs (van Buuren et al, 1999;Arehart et al, 2011;Higgins et al, 2012;Croghan et al, 2014;Kirchberger and Russo, 2016).…”
Section: Consistency Across Other Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitting a music program for a child should be done with consideration of the genres of music the child listens to or the type of instrument the child plays. Music, unlike speech, is very heterogeneous in terms of frequency spectrum and dynamics (e.g., Kirchberger & Russo, 2016). Hearing aid settings appropriate for one genre of music or one type of instrument may not be appropriate for another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult hearing aid users report that music is important to them and that they listen to music regularly, but they also report mixed benefit of hearing aid use and many problems with hearing aids during music listening (Feldmann & Kumpf, 1988;Leek, Molis, Kubli, & Tufts, 2008;Madsen & Moore, 2014). Mixed benefit of hearing aid use among adults for music listening is likely the result of many factors, including degree of hearing loss, duration of hearing loss, deficits in suprathreshold processing, and the limits of hearing aids for reproducing music with high fidelity (Arehart, Kates, & Anderson, 2011;Chasin, 2006Chasin, , 2012Chasin, , 2014Chasin & Hockley, 2014;Chasin & Russo, 2004;Croghan, Arehart, & Kates, 2012, 2014Hockley, Bahlmann, & Fulton, 2012;Kirchberger & Russo, 2016;Madsen & Moore, 2014;Madsen, Stone, McKinney, Fitz, & Moore, 2015;Moore, 2016;Mussoi & Bentler, 2015;Tan & Moore, 2008). Whether these findings extend to children who are HH and use hearing aids is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%