Dynamic Reconstruction of Facial Paralysis in Craniofacial Microsomia

Abstract

Background: Craniofacial microsomia is associated with maxillomandibular hypoplasia, microtia, soft-tissue deficiency, and variable severity of cranial nerve dysfunction, most often of the facial nerve. This study evaluated the incidence of facial paralysis in patients with craniofacial microsomia and outcomes after free functioning muscle transfer for dynamic smile reconstruction. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed from 1985 to 2018 to identify pediatric patients with craniofacial microsomia and severe facial nerve dysfunction who underwent dynamic smile reconstruction with free functioning muscle transfer. Preoperative and postoperative facial symmetry and oral commissure excursion during maximal smile were measured using photogrammetric facial analysis software. Results: This study included 186 patients with craniofacial microsomia; 41 patients (21 male patients, 20 female patients) had documented facial nerve dysfunction (22 percent) affecting all branches (51 percent) or the mandibular branch only (24 percent). Patients with severe facial paralysis (n = 8) underwent smile reconstruction with a free functioning muscle transfer neurotized either with a cross-face nerve graft (n = 7) or with the ipsilateral motor nerve to masseter (n =1). All patients achieved volitional muscle contraction with improvement in lip symmetry and oral commissure excursion (median, 8 mm; interquartile range, 3 to 10 mm). The timing of orthognathic surgery and facial paralysis reconstruction was an important consideration in optimizing patient outcomes. Conclusions: The authors’ institution’s incidence of facial nerve dysfunction in children with craniofacial microsomia is 22 percent. Free functioning muscle transfer is a reliable option for smile reconstruction in children with craniofacial microsomia. To optimize outcomes, a novel treatment algorithm is proposed for craniofacial microsomia patients likely to require both orthognathic surgery and facial paralysis reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Facial Suspension and Reconstruction of the Nasolabial Fold with the Use of Local Dermal-Fat Flap

“…Flaccidity associated with facial paralysis leads to soft tissue ptosis due to the loss of muscle tone and alteration of the face's aesthetic landmarks. The nasolabial fold (NLF) is a crucial facial landmark, and its effacement contributes significantly to the resulting disfigurement [5].…”

“…Dynamic resuscitation techniques, such as cross-face nerve grafts and microsurgical gracilis flaps [5], aim to restore muscle function and improve facial symmetry. While these techniques can provide more natural-looking results, they are complex procedures that require specialized surgical skills and lengthy recovery periods.…”

Integrating Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-Printed Tools with Iliac Bone Grafts for Orbital and Zygomatic Reconstruction in Hemifacial Microsomia Patients

“…The correction of facial skeletal deformities is paramount given their profound impact on the development of soft and associated non-skeletal tissues [20]. Orthognathic surgery serves as a primary intervention to rectify these skeletal abnormalities in HFM patients, with the goal of enhancing facial symmetry and aesthetics [4,21]. Optimal surgical results are achieved when the delineated preoperative strategy is meticulously implemented and communicated during the surgical intervention.…”

Current Treatments and Future Directions for Facial Paralysis

“…15 Other syndromes associated with facial palsy include branchial arch malformations such as Goldenhar syndrome. 16 Bell's palsy represents 80% of the caseload of a facial palsy surgeon. There is no known causative factor; however, there is evidence herpes simplex virus plays a role.…”