2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic recrystallization behavior and microstructural evolution in a Mn–Cr gear steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DRX grain sizes are almost equal at the same of deformation condition in spite of different pre-existing grain sizes. This result is in good agreement with conclusion reported previously [7] . …”
Section: Effect Of Deformation Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The DRX grain sizes are almost equal at the same of deformation condition in spite of different pre-existing grain sizes. This result is in good agreement with conclusion reported previously [7] . …”
Section: Effect Of Deformation Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In their study, the effects of deformation temperature and strain rate on the DRX kinetics were considered. However, a large amount of work [26][27][28][29] showed that the characteristics of DRX behavior depend on not only the deformation temperature and strain rate but also the initial grain size for the metals or alloys. Thus, the DRX kinetics in the hot deformed 42CrMo steel still need further investigation by considering the effects of initial grain size on the DRX behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 indicates the variation of flow stress with reciprocal temperature. According to Equation (8), the value of Q can be derived from the average slope of linearly regressed data, which is 487.21 kJ mol −1 , higher than Mn–Cr gear steel (378.60 kJ mol −1 ) [21], Q235(363.10 kJ mol −1 ) steel [22] and 316LN stainless steel (458.85 kJ mol −1 ) [12].
Figure 4 Relationship between ln(sinh(ασ p )) and 1/ T.
Figure 5 Relationship between flow stress and Zener–Hollomon parameter.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%