2009
DOI: 10.4161/chan.3.4.9247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic regulation of IP3 receptor clustering and activity by IP3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these led to the suggestion that the critical trigger for IP 3 R clustering was IP 3 binding to IP 3 Rs followed by the necessity of the subsequent conformational transition of these channels to their open state [15,18]. We found that IP 3 Rs recorded from the outer nuclear membranes of DT40 cells expressing recombinant IP 3 Rs (isoform 1 and 3) are initially randomly distributed, but a low [IP 3 ] (lower than required to maximally activate them, <300 nM) rapidly and reversibly drive these receptors into small clusters [22,23]. The molecular driving force of IP 3 R clustering is hitherto unknown.…”
Section: What Prompts Ip 3 Rs To Cluster?mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these led to the suggestion that the critical trigger for IP 3 R clustering was IP 3 binding to IP 3 Rs followed by the necessity of the subsequent conformational transition of these channels to their open state [15,18]. We found that IP 3 Rs recorded from the outer nuclear membranes of DT40 cells expressing recombinant IP 3 Rs (isoform 1 and 3) are initially randomly distributed, but a low [IP 3 ] (lower than required to maximally activate them, <300 nM) rapidly and reversibly drive these receptors into small clusters [22,23]. The molecular driving force of IP 3 R clustering is hitherto unknown.…”
Section: What Prompts Ip 3 Rs To Cluster?mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The prevailing view is thus in favour of IP 3 Rs existing as pre-formed static clusters in the ER membrane and within each cluster, IP 3 Rs are stimulated by CICR initiated by a Ca 2 + blip. Our results have led us to suggest that IP 3 Rs may assemble 'on demand' into clusters in response to IP 3 and the process is dynamically regulated [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This may facilitate (i) local elevation of luminal [Ca 2+ ] in jSR; and (ii) accumulation of molecules, including Ca 2+ , Na + (Blaustein et al, 2002;Poburko et al, 2008), and IP3, in the cytosolic microvolume from which the diffusion into the bulk cytoplasm is markedly restricted (Poburko et al, 2008). Taking this into account, the following factors may favour activation of IP3Rs by Ca 2+ influx: (i) a robust increase in [Ca 2+ ]i in the junctional cytosolic microvolume (Blaustein et al, 2002;Poburko et al, 2008); (ii) spontaneous basal activity of PLC (Prestwich and Bolton, 1991;Gordienko and Bolton, 2002;Horowitz et al, 2005;Peng et al, 2007); (iii) Ca 2+ activation of type 1 IP3Rs with positive co-operativity (Foskett et al, 2007); (iv) regulation of IP3Rs by the SR luminal [Ca 2+ ] (Rainbow et al, 2009);and (v) IP3R clustering (Rahman and Taylor, 2009).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Ca 2+ ] i is increased following Ca 2+ release from intracellular stores accomplished by the IP3 receptor [23]. The emptying of the intracellular stores is followed by activation of Ca 2+ release activated current I crac [24] leading to store operated Ca 2+ entry (SOCE) [25][26][27][28], which is accomplished by the pore forming Ca 2+ channel subunits Orai1, Orai2 or Orai3 [29][30][31][32][33] and their regulators STIM1 or STIM2 [34][35][36][37][38] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%