2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-0724-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic regulation of Pep-induced immunity through post-translational control of defence transcript splicing

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon liberation from their precursors, AtPeps interact with two leucine‐rich receptor kinases, PEP RECEPTOR1 and ‐2 (AtPEPR1 and AtPEPR2), which activate downstream signaling in complex with SOMATIC EMBRYO RECEPTOR KINASE (SERK) co‐receptors and the membrane‐associated cytoplasmic kinases BOTRYTIS‐INDUCED KINASE 1 (BIK1) and BRASSINOSTEROID‐SIGNALING KINASE 5 (BSK5) (Yamaguchi et al ., 2006, 2010; Krol et al ., 2010; Lu et al ., 2010; Postel et al ., 2010; Roux et al ., 2011; Liu et al ., 2013; Majhi et al ., 2019). Upon activation of the receptor complex, signaling occurs through the mitogen‐activated protein (MAP) kinases MPK3/6/4/11, production of the phytohormones jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) and of ROS generated by NADPH oxidase enzymes (Huffaker and Ryan, 2007; Bartels et al ., 2013; Huffaker et al ., 2013; Tintor et al ., 2013; Dressano et al ., 2019). This is accompanied by modulation of ion channels and transporters that increases calcium levels in the cytoplasm and reduces the export of protons to the apoplast (Huffaker et al ., 2006; Ma et al ., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon liberation from their precursors, AtPeps interact with two leucine‐rich receptor kinases, PEP RECEPTOR1 and ‐2 (AtPEPR1 and AtPEPR2), which activate downstream signaling in complex with SOMATIC EMBRYO RECEPTOR KINASE (SERK) co‐receptors and the membrane‐associated cytoplasmic kinases BOTRYTIS‐INDUCED KINASE 1 (BIK1) and BRASSINOSTEROID‐SIGNALING KINASE 5 (BSK5) (Yamaguchi et al ., 2006, 2010; Krol et al ., 2010; Lu et al ., 2010; Postel et al ., 2010; Roux et al ., 2011; Liu et al ., 2013; Majhi et al ., 2019). Upon activation of the receptor complex, signaling occurs through the mitogen‐activated protein (MAP) kinases MPK3/6/4/11, production of the phytohormones jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) and of ROS generated by NADPH oxidase enzymes (Huffaker and Ryan, 2007; Bartels et al ., 2013; Huffaker et al ., 2013; Tintor et al ., 2013; Dressano et al ., 2019). This is accompanied by modulation of ion channels and transporters that increases calcium levels in the cytoplasm and reduces the export of protons to the apoplast (Huffaker et al ., 2006; Ma et al ., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to buffer these attenuation mechanisms the plant would need to adopt a safeguard against sustained activation of CPK28. Recent work has demonstrated that following cell stimulation with AtPep1 (85) or the bacterial flagellin immunogenic epitope flg22 (86), alternative CPK28 transcripts are produced that generate a truncated isoform that lacks the C-terminal EF-hand lobe. This CPK28 variant could act to outcompete Ca 2+ “competent” proteins for downstream substrates, alleviating immune attenuation (87).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arabidopsis thaliana plants used in this study were Columbia (Col-0) ecotype. SALK_015201 encodes the irr-1 knock-out allele (also annotated as SALK_015201C and SALKseq_015201) and SALK_066572 encodes the irr-2 knock-out allele which were previously characterized (Dressano et al, 2020; Petrov et al, 2013). Homozygous phyB-9 seed stocks (ABRC stock number CS6217) were also previously characterized (Reed et al, 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA-seq reads for twelve individuals comprising Pep-treated and untreated irr-1 mutant and wild-type plants (three biological replicates per genotype per condition) were obtained from the NCBI SRA with IDs SRR11218900 - SRR11218911 (Dressano et al, 2020). The paired-end 150-bp reads were aligned to the TAIR10 reference genome (Lamesch et al, 2012) using the spliced alignment option of the STAR aligner (Dobin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation