2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40870-018-0141-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response and Microstructure Evolution of AA2219-T4 and AA2219-T6 Aluminum Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, aluminum alloys are considered strain rate insensitive within commonly tested conditions, which is either the low quasi‐static (less than 1 s −1 ) or high dynamic (higher than 1000 s −1 ) range at room temperature. [ 8,35 ] Literature reported range of the strain rate sensitivity parameter C generally falls within 0.001–0.04 for aluminum alloys. [ 36,37 ] In the calibrated material model in this study, parameter C is near the top of the reported range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, aluminum alloys are considered strain rate insensitive within commonly tested conditions, which is either the low quasi‐static (less than 1 s −1 ) or high dynamic (higher than 1000 s −1 ) range at room temperature. [ 8,35 ] Literature reported range of the strain rate sensitivity parameter C generally falls within 0.001–0.04 for aluminum alloys. [ 36,37 ] In the calibrated material model in this study, parameter C is near the top of the reported range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed ASBs in aluminum alloys are commonly categorized into deformed bands including elongated grains and transformed bands formed by equiaxed ultrafine grains depending on the severity of loading [26]. Olasumboye et al [29] have recently investigated the dynamic response and microstructure evolution of AA2219-T4 and AA2219-T6 aluminum alloys. They characterized the plastic deformation of the T4 and the T6 tempered alloys by intense shear localization at 3500 s −1 strain rate leading to fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature presents a wide range of research and results obtained from analyzes on the behavior of materials subjected to shock stresses. The analyzed materials are homogeneous metallic or non-metallic [1][2][3][4][5][6], composite or fabric of different types of natural or artificial fibers [7][8][9][10][11]20]. Also, the penetrator may be a solid of various geometry [12,13], it may be a shock wave propagated through a gaseous [14,15], liquid [16,17] or solid [12] medium, a molten state, a plasma state material [18], or a laser wave [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, the penetrator is a shock wave propagating in the gaseous medium [18] or liquid [10,16] studies assessing the behavior of the structure and obtaining conclusions about the degree of protection provided by it. A separate class of studies addresses structural changes in solid or gaseous target material by impact with a laser wave [5,6,9] in order to identify new processing technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%