2015
DOI: 10.1680/geot.sip.15.p.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic response of flexible square tunnels: centrifuge testing and validation of existing design methodologies

Abstract: Tsinidis, Grigorios and Pitilakis, Kyriazis and Madabhushi, Gopol and Heron, Charles (2015) Dynamic response of flexible square tunnels: centrifuge testing and validation of existing design methodologies. Geotechnique, 65 (5). pp. 401-417. ISSN 1751-7656 Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34819/1/2016%20-%20Tsinidis%20-%20Geotechnique%20-%20Dynamic%20Response%20of%20Flexible%20Square%20Tunnels%20Centrifuge %20Testing%20and%20Validation.pdf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some discrepancies may come due to recording issues that are present in soil pressure transducers. 13 In addition, the relative stiffness of sensing plate and effect of grain size distribution may affect the results. 20 In general, peak dynamic stresses from numerical analysis are in good agreement with the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some discrepancies may come due to recording issues that are present in soil pressure transducers. 13 In addition, the relative stiffness of sensing plate and effect of grain size distribution may affect the results. 20 In general, peak dynamic stresses from numerical analysis are in good agreement with the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The acceleration response of tunnel is higher than surrounding soil for high shaking. 6 Under seismic loading, the tunnel vibrates in rocking mode, and racking 13 also bending deformation occurs in the tunnel. 6 However, most of the researchers are more focused on internal forces, deformation and acceleration developed in tunnel during seismic activity, very few studies have been carried on the stresses generated in the soil during earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the second kind of analysis is evaluated by comparing it to the numerical dynamic analysis and experimental study. The simplified pseudo-static analyses can underestimate or overestimate the full dynamic results with a difference of 20-40% [18]. Arguably, the last category of methods, numerical full-time analysis, is considered as the most accurate method for the seismic analysis of underground structures [13], provided that some of the most important aspects (e.g., soil nonlinearity, relative soil-structure stiffness and soil-structure interface) can be modeled appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most well‐known tools for quantifying the damage index is conducting large number of experiments for structure 28–30 . Due to limitations of laboratory facilities and cost, only scaled models are used in most laboratory experiment, and the size effect 31,32 cannot be avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most well-known tools for quantifying the damage index is conducting large number of experiments for structure. [28][29][30] Due to limitations of laboratory facilities and cost, only scaled models are used in most laboratory experiment, and the size effect 31,32 cannot be avoided. Those limitations are further amplified in the course of investigating underground structures because of the soil-structure interaction effects that have to be considered in the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%