2019
DOI: 10.1515/eng-2019-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic safety system for collaboration of operators and industrial robots

Abstract: There is an increasing need to have a safety system, which allows safe collaboration of operators and industrial robots. Industrial robots are powerful and therefore dangerous impacts and crashes need to be prevented by keeping safe distance between moving robot and the operator. Safe distance can be achieved by monitoring the position and speed of the robot and the position of the operator. Separation distance, speeds and performance of the control system, sensors and actuators are regulated by standards, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A collaborative workspace should be configured at a distance that satisfies the ISO 13855 requirements. To assess the reliability of SMS, the collaborative robot should accurately detect the presence of a human and automatically restart when the human leaves the collaborative workspace (Belingardi et al, 2017; Malm et al, 2019; Marvel & Norcross, 2017). HG, the second level of collaborative operation, allows a human operator to easily guide and program the movements of a collaborative robot (Belingardi et al, 2017; Safeea & Neto, 2022; Vicentini, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A collaborative workspace should be configured at a distance that satisfies the ISO 13855 requirements. To assess the reliability of SMS, the collaborative robot should accurately detect the presence of a human and automatically restart when the human leaves the collaborative workspace (Belingardi et al, 2017; Malm et al, 2019; Marvel & Norcross, 2017). HG, the second level of collaborative operation, allows a human operator to easily guide and program the movements of a collaborative robot (Belingardi et al, 2017; Safeea & Neto, 2022; Vicentini, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main drawbacks of intrinsic safety techniques lies in robots slowing down or even stopping altogether in the presence of a person, resulting in a reduction in productivity, which is undesirable for workers. In addition to concerns about productivity, even though intrinsic techniques have been demonstrated to be sufficiently safe [12], users might still experience a sense of risk when entering the area of influence of a robot. This concern arises from the possibility of potential hazards, such as malfunctions in safety mechanisms or risks associated with the robot holding objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize such risks, the most straightforward way is to keep the robots isolated [4]. Numbers of strategy are innovated by integrating different sensors to improve safe human-robot interactions [5]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%