2010
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1090.0272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Scheduling of Outpatient Appointments Under Patient No-Shows and Cancellations

Abstract: This paper develops a framework and proposes heuristic dynamic policies for scheduling patient appointments, taking into account the fact that patients may cancel or not show up for their appointments. In a simulation study that considers a model clinic, which is created using data obtained from an actual clinic, we find that the heuristics proposed outperform all the other benchmark policies, particularly when the patient load is high compared with the regular capacity. Supporting earlier findings in the lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
191
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of the proposed method can be used to develop more effective appointment scheduling (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). It can also be used for developing effective strategies, such as selective overbooking for reducing the negative effects of disturbances and filling appointment slots while maintaining short waiting times (13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of the proposed method can be used to develop more effective appointment scheduling (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). It can also be used for developing effective strategies, such as selective overbooking for reducing the negative effects of disturbances and filling appointment slots while maintaining short waiting times (13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sequential scheduling on the other hand appointment requests arrive gradually over time and the scheduler has to fit each patient to one of the available slots. See, for example, Gerchak et al (1996), Patrick et al (2008), Liu et al (2010), andFeldman et al (2014). Our investigation here is at a more strategic level and can be considered as a prerequisite to advance and online scheduling: we find the capacity needed for pre-booked non-urgent patients so that a reasonably quick access can be guaranteed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since in our clinic data, as illustrated in Figure 1, the no-show probability does not show a strong increasing trend with respect to waiting time, we assume a fixed no-show probability in the first two models. However, to extend the applicability of our models to situations where such trend does exist, as in the clinics studied by Green and Savin (2008) and Liu et al (2010), we develop a third model where no-show probability is an increasing function of the size of appointment backlog. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes an analytical comparison of traditional and advanced access appointment systems [23]; the impact of no-shows [5,11,12,17]; the importance of considering patient preferences [10,26]; and capacity allocation methods that allow practices to offer a blend of prescheduled (non-urgent) and same-day (urgent) appointments [2,20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%