2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic seismic signatures of saturated porous rocks containing two orthogonal sets of fractures: theory versus numerical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low frequencies, while the velocities in these two cases are slightly different, the behavior of attenuation factors is similar. These observations are consistent with those of Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, (), Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, (), and Guo, Rubino, Glubokovskikh, et al, (), which found that the 3‐D (penny‐shaped cracks) theoretical predictions are in good agreement with the 2‐D (slit cracks) numerical simulations after scaling the elastic moduli in the low‐ and high‐frequency limits. Similar conclusions are also drawn by Barbosa et al () and Hunziker et al () through the comparison of the 2‐D and 3‐D numerical simulations for the aligned fracture cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At low frequencies, while the velocities in these two cases are slightly different, the behavior of attenuation factors is similar. These observations are consistent with those of Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, (), Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, (), and Guo, Rubino, Glubokovskikh, et al, (), which found that the 3‐D (penny‐shaped cracks) theoretical predictions are in good agreement with the 2‐D (slit cracks) numerical simulations after scaling the elastic moduli in the low‐ and high‐frequency limits. Similar conclusions are also drawn by Barbosa et al () and Hunziker et al () through the comparison of the 2‐D and 3‐D numerical simulations for the aligned fracture cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Equations and are identical to equations and , respectively. This confirms that the asymptotic behavior for the 2‐D and 3‐D cases at high frequencies is the same, which was also observed by Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al (), Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al (), and Guo, Rubino, Glubokovskikh, et al () by comparing the 2‐D numerical simulations with the 3‐D theoretical predictions. This is because at high frequencies the condition │ k 2 a │ ≫ 1 and the fluid diffusion length is much smaller than the crack length for both slit and penny‐shaped cracks.…”
Section: Analytical Solutionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When subjected to stresses, fractures can more easily close, which results in the increase of rock elastic moduli (e.g., Glubokovskikh et al, ; Mavko et al, ; Shapiro, ). Due to these important effects of fractures on rock hydraulic and elastic properties, it is of great interest to detect and characterize fractures in many disciplines, such as earth and environmental sciences, and underground engineering, among many others (e.g., Guo et al, ; Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, ; Guo, Rubino, Glubokovskikh, et al, ; Guo, Shuai, et al, ; Huo & Gong, ; Lisjak et al, ; Liu et al, ; Nelson, ; Neuzil, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that fracture sizes are usually much smaller than the seismic wavelength, it is difficult to image fractures directly on seismic profiles. For this reason, seismic attributes are often used in fracture detection and characterization (e.g., Bakulin et al, , , ; Gao, ; Guo et al, ; Guo, Rubino, Glubokovskikh, et al, ; Guo, Shuai, et al, ; Guo, Rubino, Barbosa, et al, ; Maultzsch et al, , ; Tsvankin, ). Under the in situ stress field, parallel fractures are often developed in the direction of the maximum stress (e.g., Schoenberg & Sayers, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wave attenuation plays an important role in the study of the physical properties of underground rocks, owing to its strong relation to lithology, mineral composition, grain size, degree of cementation, fluid saturation, temperature, pressure, etc. (Casula & Carcione, 1992; Guo, Rubino, et al, 2018; Müller et al, 2010; Wu, 1985). Seismic attenuation can be due to intrinsic loss or scattering at small‐scale heterogeneities and can be estimated directly from ultrasonic measurements (Adam et al, 2009; Borgomano et al, 2017; Chapman et al, 2016; Frankel & Clayton, 1986; Hu et al, 2017; Klimentos, 1990; Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%