2022
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic sensitivity to resource availability influences population responses to mismatches in a shorebird

Abstract: Climate change has caused shifts in seasonally recurring biological events leading to the temporal decoupling of consumer–resource pairs, that is, phenological mismatching. Although mismatches often affect individual fitness, they do not invariably scale up to affect populations, making it difficult to assess the risk they pose. Individual variation may contribute to this inconsistency, with changes in resource availability and consumer needs leading mismatches to have different outcomes over time. Nevertheles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, when godwits experienced slow, linear changes in climate in the past, information from previous breeding ground conditions strongly predicted godwit breeding ground arrival timing 11 . The Arctic, however, is currently experiencing some of the most rapidly changing climate regimes 39,40 – causing godwits to experience increasingly variable conditions upon arrival in recent years 22 . Thus, knowledge of previous years breeding ground conditions may be increasingly unreliable for godwits, limiting their ability to predict conditions within a given year and inform their subsequent migratory timing accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, when godwits experienced slow, linear changes in climate in the past, information from previous breeding ground conditions strongly predicted godwit breeding ground arrival timing 11 . The Arctic, however, is currently experiencing some of the most rapidly changing climate regimes 39,40 – causing godwits to experience increasingly variable conditions upon arrival in recent years 22 . Thus, knowledge of previous years breeding ground conditions may be increasingly unreliable for godwits, limiting their ability to predict conditions within a given year and inform their subsequent migratory timing accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, Beluga-breeding godwits advanced both their spring migratory and reproductive timing by 9 days between 1974-2010 11,21 . Nonetheless, in anomalously early and warm years, godwits experience phenological mismatches that significantly reduce reproductive success 22 . Godwits also exhibit high levels of mate fidelity and in some cases, rapid clutch initiation following migration 20 , suggesting that sex-specific goals may affect the strategies each sex can use to adjust their migratory timing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That earlier hatching broods had a greater probability of survival supports the idea that if human disturbance is reduced during the nesting period (i.e., beach driving restrictions), perhaps plover adults may nest earlier and thus give broods a higher chance of survival by successfully reaching older age earlier (Walker et al 2019). Many other factors could influence greater chick survival earlier in the season such as prey abundance and predator movement, which should be studied in further detail (Stantial et al 2020, Wilde et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability in metrics hampers comparisons between studies, as this will not only impact estimates of rates of phenological change [ 32 , 33 ], but also their precision [ 34 ], ultimately impacting inferences regarding the drivers of observed phenological change [ 30 , 35 ]. Fifth, different models have been used to quantify the degree of mismatch between a consumer and its resource [ 23 , 36 ], whereas the choice of a model can influence estimates of mismatch and thereby affect any downstream inference regarding their impact on the vital rates of consumers [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%