1999
DOI: 10.1145/309844.309895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
129
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A service profile provides a high-level description of a service and its provider [23,24]; it is used to request or advertise services with discovery services and capability registries. Service profiles consist of three types of information: a description of the service and the service provider; the functional behavior of the service; and several functional attributes tailored for automated service selection.…”
Section: Service Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A service profile provides a high-level description of a service and its provider [23,24]; it is used to request or advertise services with discovery services and capability registries. Service profiles consist of three types of information: a description of the service and the service provider; the functional behavior of the service; and several functional attributes tailored for automated service selection.…”
Section: Service Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, work on developing such description languages [31,2,22,27] has focussed on their application in matchmaking and brokering, ignoring the potential role of negotiation. Matchmaking is not used to locate potential trade partners, but rather to determine the functionality of another agent prior to execution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular the LARKS description language [61] is defined to realize the agent matchmaking process (both at syntactic and semantic level) by using several different filters: Context, Profile, Similarity, Signature and Constraint matching.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%