1995
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00265-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic shakedown analysis and bounds for elastoplastic structures with nonassociative, internal variable constitutive laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of associative¯ow rule (3a) and von Mises' yield function (5), the plastic dissipation (4) is expressed by, [8,18] …”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of associative¯ow rule (3a) and von Mises' yield function (5), the plastic dissipation (4) is expressed by, [8,18] …”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first line of research is concerned with extensions of the original theorem to various nonlinear behaviors, such as hardening plasticity (Pham, 2008;Nguyen, 2003), non standard plasticity (Corigliano et al, 1995;Bodovillé and De Saxcé, 2001), contact with friction (Ahn et al, 2008), phase-transformation (Peigney, 2010). A second (and complementing) line of research is concerned with the development of numerical methods for efficiently determining the shakedown domain in the space of load parameters (Zarka et al, 1988;Maitournam et al, 2002;Carvelli et al, 1999;Peigney andStolz, 2001, 2003;Simon and Weichert, 2012;Spiliopoulos and Panagiotou, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our elastic-perfectly plastic model for the reinforced concrete plates has the advantage of simplicity and can be considered the ®rst approximation for the realistic behavior of practical reinforced plates, which generally should be much more complicated, especially, for dynamic processes. Some more re®ned features, such as hardening and nonassociativity effects, can also be included into more complicated schemes of shakedown analysis [2,3], other effects, like degradation of elastic and plastic properties or viscous effect, can hardly be treated within the framework of classical shakedown theory. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative upper-bound approaches, based on the dual form of the static theorem, formulated by means of convex analysis, are developed in [4,9,13]. Perhaps the most striking feature of the shakedown analysis is that it applies to general dynamic problems, which lie outside the framework of the plastic limit design, [1,2,3,5,15,16]. Many practical structures are subjected not only to static and quasistatic loads, but also to certain dynamic¯uctuating ones called the quasiperiodic dynamic loads, see [15]), such as action of working machines and transport upon the structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%