2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic simulation and exergy analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle integrated with vapor compression refrigeration system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volumetric efficiency for R-134a (41%) is lower than that for R-600a, which is 60%, due to the cycle's high-pressure ratio, which was confirmed by Groll [22] and to the difference in the specific volume of the refrigerants. This result agrees with that in the study [11], but is down more due to the irreversibility increase in the evaporator. The isentropic efficiency is around 65% for the cycle of R-134a, which is lower than that for R-600a, 70%, due to the irreversibility of the compression process.…”
Section: Exergy Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volumetric efficiency for R-134a (41%) is lower than that for R-600a, which is 60%, due to the cycle's high-pressure ratio, which was confirmed by Groll [22] and to the difference in the specific volume of the refrigerants. This result agrees with that in the study [11], but is down more due to the irreversibility increase in the evaporator. The isentropic efficiency is around 65% for the cycle of R-134a, which is lower than that for R-600a, 70%, due to the irreversibility of the compression process.…”
Section: Exergy Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, the condenser has the greatest efficiency, followed by the throttle valve and evaporator. Malwe et al [11] performed analytical and experimental tests for cold refrigeration rooms working with R12 using the exergy analysis technique. It was discovered that the system's second law efficiency is 58%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature difference at the pinch point is 5 °C. [2,40,41] The pinch point of ORC heat exchangers is important as it affects the system's thermal efficiency and the total heat absorbed by the working fluid. Twomey et al [40] evaluated the dynamic performance of a small-scale solar thermal cogeneration with an ORC using a scroll expander.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present result agrees with that of Daniarta et al 29 and other researchers who have shown that (ORC) systems are the most efficient and reliable method of converting waste heat from low and medium temperatures into usable power. [30][31][32][33][34] Figure 9 shows the effects of increasing the inlet temperature of the turbine on overall cycle efficiency. Increasing overall cycle efficiency is evident with an increased in turbine inlet temperature.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have shown that (ORC) systems are the most efficient and reliable method of converting waste heat from low and medium temperatures into usable power. [30][31][32][33][34] Therefore, the present article focuses on applying a new idea using the initial heating through the solar pool and the surface collector, then converting the warm water coming into superheated steam using the concentrated solar collector in the ORC. Thus, using pre-heated water with the solar collector gives temperatures in most seasons sufficient to ignite the ORC system in the present study to cover this scientific gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%