2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2014.7090325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic simulation of cervical traction therapy: Comparison between sitting and inclined positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cervical spine model was built based on a previous in-house project [8] [18] and was re-modelled with a new physics engine for performance improvement. It consisted of a skull and seven pieces of rigid cervical vertebrae (C1-C7).…”
Section: Cervical Spine and Skeleton Body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cervical spine model was built based on a previous in-house project [8] [18] and was re-modelled with a new physics engine for performance improvement. It consisted of a skull and seven pieces of rigid cervical vertebrae (C1-C7).…”
Section: Cervical Spine and Skeleton Body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fater et al [7] compared the supine and sitting position using home traction units and concluded that supine cervical traction may be more effective for increasing posterior vertebral separation. Using a dynamic simulation model, Wong et al [8] also examined the intervertebral separation of inclined and sitting positions and demonstrated that inclined position was able to create greater posterior separation in their model. While the effect of cervical traction therapy is generally recognized to create intervertebral separations, its exact mechanism still has not been fully understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation