2015 XVIII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/scm.2015.7190414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic software testing models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that there is no universal model of the software evaluation and test planning. Moreover, beside the described classes of models, studies suggest simulation models [29], structural models [22], fuzzy models [26,27], interval models [30], software dynamic models [31][32][33], software/hardware complex models [34,35], Bayesian model modifications [19,30,36,37], as well as neural networks applied for certain scientific purposes [38,39]. In order to select a suitable model, a number of qualitative and quantitative criteria can be suggested [40].…”
Section: Evaluation Models and Test Planning Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that there is no universal model of the software evaluation and test planning. Moreover, beside the described classes of models, studies suggest simulation models [29], structural models [22], fuzzy models [26,27], interval models [30], software dynamic models [31][32][33], software/hardware complex models [34,35], Bayesian model modifications [19,30,36,37], as well as neural networks applied for certain scientific purposes [38,39]. In order to select a suitable model, a number of qualitative and quantitative criteria can be suggested [40].…”
Section: Evaluation Models and Test Planning Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approval of mandatory requirements for formalizing the results of compliance assessment of high-confidence information protection software [1] lent relevance to the use of mathematical models for assessing IS software performance reliability and safety. Although studies into mathematical models for software reliability assessment were first undertaken back in the second half of the last century [2,3], these issues remain relevant nowadays [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. All this relates both to software manufacturing technologies (for example, open source software) and to newly introduced international standards in the software engineering and information security area (ISO/IEC 15408, ISO/IEC 33001, IEC 61508, IEC 61511 etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this relates both to software manufacturing technologies (for example, open source software) and to newly introduced international standards in the software engineering and information security area (ISO/IEC 15408, ISO/IEC 33001, IEC 61508, IEC 61511 etc.) [7,17,18]. It should be understood that the concept of reliability is equivalent to that of software safety, if it is assumed that all detected defects (errors) and vulnerabilities are not strictly identified as deliberate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%