Studies of the categorical perception (CP) of sensory continua have a long and rich history in psychophysics. In 1977, Macmillan,Kaplan, and Creelman introduced the use of signal detection theory to CP studies. Anderson and colleagues simultaneously proposed the first neural model for CP, yet this line of research has been less well explored. In this paper, we assess the ability of neural-network models of CP to predict the psychophysical performance of real observers with speech sounds and artificial! novel stimuli. We show that a variety of neural mechanisms are capable of generating the characteristics of CPO Hence, CP may not be a special mode of perception but an emergent property of any sufficiently powerful general learning system. Studies of the categorical perception (CP) of sensory continua have a long and rich history. For a comprehensive review up until a decade ago, see the volume edited by Hamad (1987). An important question concerns the precise definition ofCP. According to the seminal contribution of Macmillan, Kaplan, and Creelman (1977), "the relation between an observer's ability to identify stimuli along a continuum and his ability to discriminate between pairs of stimuli drawn from that continuum is a classic problem in psychophysics" (p. 452). The extent to which discrimination is predictable from identification performance has long been considered the acid test of categorical-as opposed to continuous-perception.Continuous perception is often characterized by (approximate) adherence to Weber's law, according to which the difference limen is a constant fraction of stimulus magnitude. Also, discrimination is much better than identification: I Observers can make only a small number of identifications along a single dimension, but they can make relative (e.g., pairwise) discriminations between a much larger number of stimuli (G. A. Miller, 1956). By contrast, CP was originally defined (e.g., Liberman, Cooper, Shankweiler, & Studdert-Kennedy, 1967;Liberman, Harris, Hoffman, & Griffith, 1957) as occurring when the grain of discriminability coincided with (and We are grateful to David Wykes, who programmed the brain-state-ina-box neural simulation. Neil Macmillan kindly clarified for us some technical points relating to the psychophysics of the ABX task. The perceptive, critical comments of Robert Goldstone, Stephen Grossberg, Keith Kluender, Neil Macmillan, Dom Massaro, Dick Pastore, David Pisoni, Philip Quinlan, Mark Steyvers, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, and Michel Treisman on an earlier draft of this paper enabled us to improve it markedly. The VOT stimuli used here were produced at Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, with assistance from NICHD Contract NOI-HD-5-2910. Thanks to Doug Whalen for his time and patience. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to R. I. Damper, Image, Speech and Intelligent Systems (ISIS) Research Group, Bldg. I, Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton S017 IBJ, England (e-mail: rid@ecs.soton.a...