2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe

Abstract: Speech perception requires rapid integration of acoustic input with context-dependent knowledge. Recent methodological advances have allowed researchers to identify underlying information representations in primary and secondary auditory cortex, and to examine how context modulates these representations. We review recent studies that focus on contextual modulations of neural activity in the superior temporal gyrus (STG), a major hub for spectrotemporal encoding. Recent findings suggest a highly interactive flo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All subjects also had an FNC during picture naming with interactions between posterior superior temporal gyrus or supramarginal gyrus and either sensorimotor cortex, Broca’s area, or both (red/triangles in Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 2), with timing strongly aligned to verbal response onset (red in Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure 3). This alignment is consistent with pSTG’s role in auditory processing of speech (Price et al, 1992; Steinschneider et al, 2011; Leonard and Chang, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…All subjects also had an FNC during picture naming with interactions between posterior superior temporal gyrus or supramarginal gyrus and either sensorimotor cortex, Broca’s area, or both (red/triangles in Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 2), with timing strongly aligned to verbal response onset (red in Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure 3). This alignment is consistent with pSTG’s role in auditory processing of speech (Price et al, 1992; Steinschneider et al, 2011; Leonard and Chang, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There is accumulating evidence that later activity in more anterior STG neural populations reflects the higher-order hierarchical processing of speech as part of the ventral stream of word recognition (Crinion, Lambon- Ralph, Warburton, Howard, & Wise, 2003; DeWitt & Rauschecker, 2012; Hickok & Poeppel, 2007; Leonard & Chang, 2014; Rauschecker & Scott, 2009). In contrast, auditory-evoked activity in frontal motor areas has generated a lively debate regarding the role of motor regions in speech perception (Hickok et al, 2011; Saur et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incoming acoustic input is not simply sequentially matched with stored templates, but rather is processed in the context of deeply learned knowledge about other words in the language that share important lexical features (Toscano, Anderson, & McMurray, 2013). This provides empirical information about how spatially and temporally distributed lexical representations (Marslen-Wilson, 1997; McClelland & Elman, 1986) are stored and accessed rapidly during speech perception, often dependent on the context in which they are heard (Leonard & Chang, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%