2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(11)60139-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic stability of passive bipedal walking on rough terrain: A preliminary simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited understanding of human stability control is reflected by the fragmentation of currently available models for the locomotion [9,20,21,35,49,56,89,109,118]. In addition, the complexity of the phenomenon and even simple passive walkers manifests variegated dynamics when deployed on rough terrains [78,79]. This questions the source of variety in such behaviours and the limiting factor for the current models to replicate the bipedal dynamics.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited understanding of human stability control is reflected by the fragmentation of currently available models for the locomotion [9,20,21,35,49,56,89,109,118]. In addition, the complexity of the phenomenon and even simple passive walkers manifests variegated dynamics when deployed on rough terrains [78,79]. This questions the source of variety in such behaviours and the limiting factor for the current models to replicate the bipedal dynamics.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal models are:• The Inverted Pendulum and Compass Gait: These formulations rely on the analogy between the legs and an inverted pendulum. Being a good and simple analogy, it is accurate to describe the system dynamic during single support[20,21,62,[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. The basic formulations of these models assume a rigid system and a rigid isometric environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the swing foot gets in contact with the ground, the walker enters the double support phase. Many researchers assume the double support phase to be instantaneous, and model the interaction between the swing foot and the ground as an inelastic rigid impact [7, 10, 21, 22], such that the swing foot will not rebound or slip after impact. However, the contact constraint cannot be preserved without proper contact force control in practice.…”
Section: Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the absence of actuators yields a highly fragile basin of attraction, limiting the locomotion capabilities of PCB to slightly inclined downhill terrains. Such pas-sive models exhibit even more limited performance on rough terrains (Su andDingwell 2007, Afshar andRen 2012). Adaptation to such terrains and compensation for perturbations require a large basin of attraction with active control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%