2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6485
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic SUMO modification regulates mitotic chromosome assembly and cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: The small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), initially characterized as a suppressor of a mutation in the gene encoding the centromeric protein MIF2, is involved in many aspects of cell cycle regulation. The dynamics of conjugation and deconjugation and the role of SUMO during the cell cycle remain unexplored. Here we used Caenorhabditis elegans to establish the contribution of SUMO to a timely and accurate cell division. Chromatin-associated SUMO conjugates increase during metaphase but decrease rapidly during a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(95 reference statements)
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Downregulation of Ubc9 leads to an increase in DSBs that are similarly distributed along the AP axis. Chromosomal abnormalities were also evident after Ubc9(RNAi), which is consistent with both defective DNA repair response and chromosomal segregation [21,[47][48][49]. We also noted that Ubc9 downregulation leads to DNA damage response that occurs in clusters in both anterior and posterior regions, suggesting there may be focus of cells that are more susceptible to accumulate DSB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Downregulation of Ubc9 leads to an increase in DSBs that are similarly distributed along the AP axis. Chromosomal abnormalities were also evident after Ubc9(RNAi), which is consistent with both defective DNA repair response and chromosomal segregation [21,[47][48][49]. We also noted that Ubc9 downregulation leads to DNA damage response that occurs in clusters in both anterior and posterior regions, suggesting there may be focus of cells that are more susceptible to accumulate DSB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Previous studies have suggested knockdown of Ubc9 is a key regulator of G1/S phase transition through various mechanisms of action [25,28,42,44]. Additional findings suggest Ubc9 knockdown induces DNA damage and chromosomal abnormalities, which would block cells from passing the critical cell cycle checkpoints [21,[47][48][49]. Therefore, this blockage in G1 phase could also impair the progression of post-mitotic progeny that will negatively impact the maintenance of differentiated tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, overexpression of ULP2 (also known as SMT4) suppresses defects in chromosome condensation and segregation, suggesting its role in regulating chromosome segregation (10,12). This role of Ulp2 in chromosome segregation appears to be conserved in higher eukaryotes including Caenorhabditis elegans and human cells, although its targets are poorly known (13,14). Consistent with its nuclear function, Ulp2 has been shown to localize throughout the nucleus and occasionally the nucleolus (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another scenario, which is not necessarily mutually exclusive with that discussed above, is that the need for the SUMOylated form of a protein may be restricted to a very specific time window, in only specific cell types, and/or a specific state of the protein, and hence the level of the SUMOylated protein relative to that of the whole protein pool is often low. Mitotic and repair proteins are good examples where targets are modified only during the mitotic phase of dividing cells or only during DNA repair (Jackson and Durocher, 2013;Pelisch et al, 2014). The reversible nature of protein SUMOylation may contribute to this process.…”
Section: Target Modification By Sumo: Implications and Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%