2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic surface control for a class of stochastic non‐linear systems with input saturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 11: It is worth noting that, in this example, the upper bound of |g 1 | = 1 + 0.1x 1 2 is not easy to establish. Therefore, some existing DSC schemes proposed in [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] may be not able to design controller for system (41). On the contrary, from the above simulation results, a nice tracking performance is provided by using the proposed control scheme.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 11: It is worth noting that, in this example, the upper bound of |g 1 | = 1 + 0.1x 1 2 is not easy to establish. Therefore, some existing DSC schemes proposed in [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] may be not able to design controller for system (41). On the contrary, from the above simulation results, a nice tracking performance is provided by using the proposed control scheme.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Remark 7: In most existing DSC schemes for non-linear systems preceded by input saturation [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], the coupling terms g i z i e i in (36) are decoupled to |g i | z i 2 and |g i | e i 2 by using Young's inequality, the corresponding surface gains k i and the time constants τ i are always constrained by the upper bounds of |g i |, therefore, the upper bounds of |g i | are required to be a priori known for control design. However, in the proposed approach here, with the utilisation the modified linear filters, the coupling terms g i z i e i are completely cancelled, which deduces that the assumption on the upper bounds of |g i | is not required.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Zhai et al [27] presented a robust adaptive fuzzy tracking control approach and Sung et al [28] proposed a robust stabilisation method via the DSC technique for the uncertain non-linear systems with unknown time delays. In addition, Yan et al [29] extended the results to stochastic nonlinear systems. Note that the systems in [23][24][25][26][27][28] are all in a pure feedback or strict feedback form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some meaningful results were presented for stochastic nonlinear systems on the basis of the quartic Lyapunov function in the literature. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] It is well known that mechanical systems are often subjected to stochastic disturbances, which significantly affect the performance. By reasonably introducing random noise, a method to construct stochastic Lagrangian control systems was given and an adaptive tracking controller was designed by Cui et al 56 Using geometric stochastic feedback control, a robust asymptotic stabilization of rigid body attitude dynamics with stochastic input torque was studied by Samiei et al 57 In earlier study, 58 a new robust stochastic control methodology was developed for unmanned aerial vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%