2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic surface matching by geodesic mapping for 3D animation transfer

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach that achieves complete matching of 3D dynamic surfaces. Surfaces are captured from multi-view video data and represented by sequences of 3D manifold meshes in motion (3D videos). We propose to perform dense surface matching between 3D video frames using geodesic diffeomorphisms. Our algorithm uses a coarse-to-fine strategy to derive a robust correspondence map, then a probabilistic formulation is coupled with a voting scheme in order to obtain local unicity of matching cand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal shape similarity tree is defined as the minimum spanning tree in shape similarity space which minimises the total non-rigid deformation for alignment across all frames. Non-rigid alignment is performed by traversing the shape similarity tree with pair-wise alignment of meshes using any existing sequential non-rigid alignment technique (de Aguiar et al 2008;Budd and Hilton 2009;Cagniart et al 2010b;Tung and Matsuyama 2010). Alignment based on the shape similarity tree optimises the path for non-rigid alignment giving reduced drift and improved robustness over previous sequential approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal shape similarity tree is defined as the minimum spanning tree in shape similarity space which minimises the total non-rigid deformation for alignment across all frames. Non-rigid alignment is performed by traversing the shape similarity tree with pair-wise alignment of meshes using any existing sequential non-rigid alignment technique (de Aguiar et al 2008;Budd and Hilton 2009;Cagniart et al 2010b;Tung and Matsuyama 2010). Alignment based on the shape similarity tree optimises the path for non-rigid alignment giving reduced drift and improved robustness over previous sequential approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of similarity measures for mesh sequences taking into account both shape and motion have been investigated (Tung and Matsuyama 2010;Huang et al 2010). In this work we utilise the temporally filtered volumetric shape histogram as a measure of shape and non-rigid motion similarity which has been shown to give good performance on reconstructed mesh sequences of people (Huang et al 2010).…”
Section: Shape Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore geodesic coordinate is invariant against mesh deformations between frames if there are no global topology changes [14]. Our shape descriptor is a set of geodesic histograms {H geo n,m (t)} where m = {1, ..., n} denotes geodesic coordinate corresponding to a tip.…”
Section: Definition Of Pgh-sdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we apply tracking-by-matching approach to acquire segment-wise coherent mesh series from each mesh interval. In particular, we used the geodesic mapping [14] since the geodesic coordinate required in [14] has already been computed for our shape descriptor.…”
Section: Segment-wise Coherent Mesh Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%