1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00655852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic surface tension of micellar solutions studied by the maximum bubble pressure method. 1. Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a) . These results were in good agreement with the previously reported results ( 9,14 ) . For the SDS / 0.4 M NaCl solution, lower g t values were observed compared with that for the SDS solution, indicating that the adsorption rate increased with the addition of electrolyte ( Fig.…”
Section: Dynamic Surface Tensionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…2a) . These results were in good agreement with the previously reported results ( 9,14 ) . For the SDS / 0.4 M NaCl solution, lower g t values were observed compared with that for the SDS solution, indicating that the adsorption rate increased with the addition of electrolyte ( Fig.…”
Section: Dynamic Surface Tensionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…[25] with Eq. [24] should lead, in principle, to the long-time approximation, the inversion of the Laplace transformation is very mathematically involved and cannot be solved analytically.…”
Section: Long Time Approximation For Dwptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The drop volume (17)(18)(19), maximum bubble pressure (21)(22)(23), oscillating jet (24), and dynamic capillary (25) have been developed and extensively used in dynamic surface tension studies. These techniques involve the surface expanding and/or the solution flow creating the new aqueous/air interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases the equilibrium surface tension is never reached and the actual surface tension experienced at the interface is much higher. The dynamic surface tension can be measured by the maximum bubble pressure method (104,105) and depends on several factors: monomer concentration (CMC), micellar stability, diffusion rate of the surfactant molecule to the interface, and surfactant concentration. The measurement of dynamic properties is relevant to technological processes where new interfaces are being formed, such as foaming or film formation, as well as to situations where surfactants diffuse to a new liquid/liquid interface, such as emulsification, or to a solid/liquid interface, such as fabric wetting.…”
Section: Relationship Between Dynamic Surface Tension and Stability Omentioning
confidence: 99%