2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic symptom networks across different at-risk stages for psychosis: An individual and transdiagnostic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contemporaneous network reflects the unique bidirectional associations among variables that occur after time effects have been taking into account. In previous work, we found that most symptom associations in this dataset occur within days (i.e., contemporaneous) rather than between days (i.e., temporal) [20,30]. This is in line with other research on diary studies that assess mental states once a day [31].…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contemporaneous network reflects the unique bidirectional associations among variables that occur after time effects have been taking into account. In previous work, we found that most symptom associations in this dataset occur within days (i.e., contemporaneous) rather than between days (i.e., temporal) [20,30]. This is in line with other research on diary studies that assess mental states once a day [31].…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A second consideration to keep in mind is that symptoms were measured only once a day, while the processes of symptom development may unfold within a shorter timeframe. In previous studies on the same dataset [20,30], we observed that most relationships between variables appeared within days rather than over days. Therefore, we looked exclusively at contemporaneous relationships between variables, which due to the design of our study reflect the associations within a day.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the empirical network condition, the network structures from two outpatients diagnosed with bipolar disorder were used as the data-generating mechanism; see Figure 3 show relatively dense connected contemporaneous and spare temporal networks (e.g., Epskamp, van Borkulo, et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2017;Kroeze et al, 2017;van der Tuin et al, 2022). For both patients, their estimated network structure adheres to these properties.…”
Section: Empirical Networkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Estimated GVAR networks based on empirical data often show relatively dense connected contemporaneous and spare temporal networks (e.g., Epskamp, van Borkulo, et al, 2018; A. J. Fisher et al, 2017; Kroeze et al, 2017; Levinson et al, 2022; van der Tuin et al, 2022). For both patients, their estimated network structure adheres to these properties.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%