Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Data Discovery and Reuse 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3359115.3359123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic system explanation

Abstract: The large amount of knowledge contained in the scientific literature can be mined using natural language processing and utilized to automatically construct models of complex networks in order to obtain a greater understanding of complex systems. In this paper, we describe the Dynamic System Explanation (DySE) framework, which configures hybrid models and executes simulations over time, relying on a granular computing approach and a range of different element update functions. A standardized tabular format asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through manual curation of machine reading output, we identified four major types of errors in the extracted interactions, namely ambiguous or misconstrued sentences (Omission error), interactions where one or both elements are incorrectly grounded (Grounding error) and interactions that have opposite directionality (Direction error) or opposite effect (Sign error) ( 7 ). In the case of Omission error, the reader denotes a relationship between two elements that does not exist in the evidence statement, while in the Grounding error, the reader was unable to match the elements in the interaction to the correct IDs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through manual curation of machine reading output, we identified four major types of errors in the extracted interactions, namely ambiguous or misconstrued sentences (Omission error), interactions where one or both elements are incorrectly grounded (Grounding error) and interactions that have opposite directionality (Direction error) or opposite effect (Sign error) ( 7 ). In the case of Omission error, the reader denotes a relationship between two elements that does not exist in the evidence statement, while in the Grounding error, the reader was unable to match the elements in the interaction to the correct IDs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the direction and the sign of interaction are both output by INDRA, there is no indication of whether an interaction is direct or indirect. On the other hand, the Dynamic System Explanation (DySE) framework ( 7 ) uses both direct and indirect interactions obtained by machine reading to automatically assemble executable models at different levels of abstraction. DySE conducts automated model testing before using models to explain systems, predict system behavior, or guide interventions; however, the accuracy or confidence in its output depends on the correctness or confidence that we have in the automatically extracted interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%