2021
DOI: 10.1002/fut.22246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic term structure models for SOFR futures

Abstract: The London InterBank Offered Rate is scheduled for discontinuation, and the replacement advocated by US regulators is the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). The only SOFR‐linked derivative with significant liquidity and trading history is the SOFR futures contract, traded at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. We use the historical record of futures prices to construct dynamic arbitrage‐free models for the SOFR term structure. We find that a Gaussian arbitrage‐free Nelson–Siegel model describes term structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its affine structure, our model setup allows for an exact computation of the error induced by the continuous-time approximation. However, it is empirically shown in [SS21] that this approximation error is practically negligible.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its affine structure, our model setup allows for an exact computation of the error induced by the continuous-time approximation. However, it is empirically shown in [SS21] that this approximation error is practically negligible.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specific case of Gaussian affine diffusive models, the futures pricing formula stated in Proposition 5.2 reduces to the explicit formula utilized in the recent work [SS21].…”
Section: D\{0}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyashenko and Mercurio (2019) propose an extension to the LIBOR Market Model to accommodate the in-arrears setting nature of term rates related to SOFR and overnight benchmark rates in general. Skov and Skovmand (2020) show that a three-factor Gaussian arbitrage-free Nelson/Siegel model is well suited for the SOFR futures market, but they do not include the time series of SOFR itself in their estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, one could argue that this is because target rates are only updated in discrete increments. Our model could be extended to reflect this, but as a first approximation, we'll accept the implication of a continuous distribution of jump sizes for now, with jumps occurring at every FOMC meeting date.18 Note that the term (t − xi) appearing in the triple sum reflects a feature of a classical Gaussian term structure model without mean reversion (as noted, for example, inSchlögl and Sommer (1998)), that the term structure of forward rates endogenously steepens ever more (see also (28) above) as time passesthis can be avoided by introducing mean reversion.19Skov and Skovmand (2020) show that a three-factor Gaussian arbitrage-free Nelson/Siegel model is well suited for the SOFR futures market, but they do not include the time series of SOFR itself in their estimation, i.e., their objective is not to match the SOFR dynamics, which have a substantial piecewise flat component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hull-White model has been applied to RFRs in Hofman (2020) and Turfus (2020). More recently, Skov and Skovmand (2021) have proposed a multi-factor Gaussian short-rate model in order to describe the SOFR futures market, while Fontana (2022) formulates a short-rate model for RFRs based on a general affine process in view of pricing applications. Always in a short-rate perspective, Rutkowski and Bickersteth (2021) propose a Vasiček joint model for SOFR and other reference rates and study the hedging of SOFR-based derivatives, also in the presence of funding costs and collateralization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%