2022
DOI: 10.1111/evj.13560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic three‐dimensional computed tomographic imaging facilitates evaluation of the equine cervical articular process joint in motion

Abstract: Background: Dynamic computed tomography (CT) imaging has been introduced in human orthopaedics and is continuing to gain popularity. With dynamic CT, video sequences of anatomical structures can be evaluated in motion. Objectives:To investigate the feasibility of dynamic CT for diagnostic imaging of the equine cervical articular process joints (APJs) and to give a detailed description of the APJ movement pattern. Study design: Descriptive cadaver imaging.Methods: Cervical specimens of twelve Warmblood horses w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very recent publication was even more innovative and investigated dynamic CT of the equine cervical spine (Schulze et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A very recent publication was even more innovative and investigated dynamic CT of the equine cervical spine (Schulze et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2019, there have been many more publications involving CT of the equine cervical spine (Brown et al., 2021; Rovel, Zimmerman, Duchateau, Adriaensen, Marien, et al., 2021; Rovel, Zimmerman, Duchateau, Adriaensen, Saunders, & Vanderperren, 2021; Rovel et al., 2023; Tucker et al., 2022), of which some also investigated computed tomographic myelography (CTM) (Kondo et al., 2022; Rovel et al., 2019; Yamada et al., 2016). A very recent publication was even more innovative and investigated dynamic CT of the equine cervical spine (Schulze et al., 2023). However, the latter was performed post‐mortem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%