Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Dynamic Underbalance perforating is a completion technique which uses a perforating system engineered to create a rapid underbalance immediately upon formation perforation. This technique – properly applied – improves well deliverability by effectively cleaning the newly-created perforation tunnels, regardless of initial static pressure conditions (overbalanced, underbalanced, or balanced). Over the past 3 years, we have conducted dozens of perforate-and-flow laboratory experiments, carefully controlling and measuring wellbore transients, and measuring post-shot productivities. Our results indicate that the cleanup mechanisms are more involved than conventionally understood. We observed that a dominant mechanism of dynamic perforation cleanup is the increase in effective perforation length. We also confirmed previous findings that DUB perforating increases tunnel diameter, while reducing the thickness of the "crushed zone" of impaired permeability, which surrounds each tunnel. Although these processes have been mentioned in general terms previously, conventional models typically simplify things by reducing perforation cleanup to the enhancement of crushed zone permeability. Though this simplification has offered a convenient means of interpreting lab data, it can yield misleading results when applied downhole. While increasing crushed zone permeability does indeed improve the productivity of real wells, the additional processes of enlarging tunnel diameter and reducing crushed zone thickness improve productivity further. Increasing the effective tunnel length provides yet another means of productivity gain, and under most circumstances is the dominant beneficial effect. We present productivity predictions of various downhole scenarios to quantify these newly-recognized effects. These findings suggest the performance differential (between DUB and non-DUB techniques) at downhole conditions can be far greater than previously recognized.
Dynamic Underbalance perforating is a completion technique which uses a perforating system engineered to create a rapid underbalance immediately upon formation perforation. This technique – properly applied – improves well deliverability by effectively cleaning the newly-created perforation tunnels, regardless of initial static pressure conditions (overbalanced, underbalanced, or balanced). Over the past 3 years, we have conducted dozens of perforate-and-flow laboratory experiments, carefully controlling and measuring wellbore transients, and measuring post-shot productivities. Our results indicate that the cleanup mechanisms are more involved than conventionally understood. We observed that a dominant mechanism of dynamic perforation cleanup is the increase in effective perforation length. We also confirmed previous findings that DUB perforating increases tunnel diameter, while reducing the thickness of the "crushed zone" of impaired permeability, which surrounds each tunnel. Although these processes have been mentioned in general terms previously, conventional models typically simplify things by reducing perforation cleanup to the enhancement of crushed zone permeability. Though this simplification has offered a convenient means of interpreting lab data, it can yield misleading results when applied downhole. While increasing crushed zone permeability does indeed improve the productivity of real wells, the additional processes of enlarging tunnel diameter and reducing crushed zone thickness improve productivity further. Increasing the effective tunnel length provides yet another means of productivity gain, and under most circumstances is the dominant beneficial effect. We present productivity predictions of various downhole scenarios to quantify these newly-recognized effects. These findings suggest the performance differential (between DUB and non-DUB techniques) at downhole conditions can be far greater than previously recognized.
Summary Dynamic-underbalance (DUB) perforating is a completion technique that uses a perforating system engineered to create a rapid underbalance immediately upon formation perforation (within tens of milliseconds or faster). This technique—properly applied—improves well deliverability by effectively cleaning the newly created perforation tunnels, regardless of initial static pressure conditions (overbalanced, underbalanced, or balanced). The authors are engaged in a multiyear program of perforate-and-flow laboratory experiments [along the lines of American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice (API RP) 19B Section 4], carefully controlling and measuring wellbore transients and measuring post-shot productivities. Experiments thus far have been limited to static balanced conditions to ensure that any cleanup observed would be attributable solely to wellbore dynamics rather than to preshot static pressure conditions. Our results provide new insight into perforation-damage and -cleanup mechanisms. We observed that a dominant source of perforation damage can be the reduction in effective flowing perforation length, and a primary mechanism of DUB cleanup is to increase this effective length. Although increasing the permeability of the crushed zone that may surround the tunnel (a conventional simplified treatment of perforation damage and cleanup) does indeed improve the productivity of real wells, the additional processes of enlarging tunnel diameter and reducing crushed-zone thickness further improve productivity. Increasing the effective tunnel length provides yet another means of productivity gain and, under many circumstances, is the dominant beneficial effect. We present productivity predictions of various downhole scenarios to demonstrate and quantify these effects. These findings indicate that the performance differential (between DUB and non-DUB techniques) at downhole conditions can be more significant than previously recognized. Future work will explore varying initial static pressure conditions (underbalance, overbalance) in conjunction with shot-time wellbore pressure transients. Work is also ongoing to probe the limits of the findings reported herein, particularly the influences of formation properties (permeability, strength, and lithology) and drilling damage.
A detailed perforating study was conducted for a high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) reservoir which provided challenging conditions for conventional perforating. To maximize productivity, a series of API RP-19B Section 2 and Section 4 experiments was conducted to optimize perforation conditions. These results were integrated with mud testing and operational considerations to create an overall completion design for the field. Section 4 tests were performed at static overbalance, static underbalance and dynamic underbalance conditions scaled to field conditions using either mud or base oil as the completion fluid. The core flow efficiency and perforation geometry were evaluated to determine the optimum perforation method to achieve the target skin. The Section 4 apparatus could not achieve absolute field pressure and temperature conditions, therefore to ensure the required perforation geometry could be achieved downhole, Section 2 tests were conducted at the HPHT field conditions of reservoir overburden stress (13,000 psi), reservoir pressure (>11,000 psi) and temperature (>300 F). The results showed that dynamic underbalance removed significant portions of the perforation crushed zone and resulted in high productivity flow even when perforating in mud. Static underbalance was significantly less effective in removing crushed zone damage and overbalanced perforating in mud yielded poor results. Perforation geometry was radically altered upon going from relatively low stress conditions to full HPHT reservoir conditions when the cores were saturated in a light mineral oil. This change in perforation geometry was not observed when the cores were saturated in water, indicating that the fluid compressibility may have a significant impact on perforation geometry under high stress conditions. These results point to the value of conducting Section 2 and Section 4 experiments early in a project's timeline so that the best completion designs can be pursued and ultimately used in the field to maximize well productivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.