2007
DOI: 10.1243/14644193jmbd89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic verification of a multi-body computational model of human head and neck for frontal, lateral, and rear impacts

Abstract: A multi-body computational model of the human head and neck was previously shown to be in good agreement with experimental findings from actual human cervical spine specimens. The model segments were tested in three directions of loading showing main and coupled motions to be accurate and realistic.The model's ability to predict the dynamic response of the head and neck, when subjected to acceleration pulses representing frontal, lateral, and rear-end impacts, is verified using experimental data derived from s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first derivatives of Equations (7) and (8), which correspond to the local coordinates of potential contact points, with respect to θ i and θ j give the local components of the vectors tangent to the curves s i and s j at points P i and P j respectively, as illustrated in Figure 5. Therefore, these tangent vectors can be expressed in local coordinates as,…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of Knee Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first derivatives of Equations (7) and (8), which correspond to the local coordinates of potential contact points, with respect to θ i and θ j give the local components of the vectors tangent to the curves s i and s j at points P i and P j respectively, as illustrated in Figure 5. Therefore, these tangent vectors can be expressed in local coordinates as,…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of Knee Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These, methods are either based on the finite elements analysis [1][2][3][4], or the multibody systems methodologies [5][6][7][8]. The finite element methods provide the system's state of stress and deformation at any time, and are most accurate and versatile, but tend to be very time consuming and require high level of information on the system, which may not be accessible to the common designer, and hence remain confined to research and development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completed model has been validated against experimental results, ranging from the individual motion segment response to the dynamic response of the whole head-neck model to frontal, lateral, and rearend impacts [30]. The model has been used to simulate the frontal and lateral sled acceleration tests per-formed at the NBDL using human volunteers [8][9][10].…”
Section: The Multi-body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has been used to simulate the frontal and lateral sled acceleration tests per-formed at the NBDL using human volunteers [8][9][10]. Good agreement was seen for both impact directions [30]. The model has also been implemented without musculature to simulate bench-top trauma experiments using cadaveric isolated cervical spine specimens.…”
Section: The Multi-body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, dynamic verification of a multi-body computational model of human head and neck for frontal, lateral, and rear impacts has been reported in [7]. Experimental validation of a 3D FE model of pelvic-femur-soft tissue complex under side impact loading can be found in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%