2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0047-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Visual Acuity during Passive Head Thrusts in Canal Planes

Abstract: We sought to determine whether the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) test, which has been used to measure the function of the two horizontal semicircular canals (SCCs), could be adapted to measure the individual function of all six SCCs using transient, rapid, unpredictable head rotation stimuli (head thrusts) in the direction of maximum sensitivity of each SCC. We examined head-thrust DVA (htDVA) performance in 19 healthy control subjects, five patients before and six patients after plugging of one superior SCC for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
86
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In DVA testing, the subject's visual acuity was measured while sitting 6.5 feet from a monitor that displayed a directional (up, down, left, right) "E" optotype only when head velocity was within 120-180°/s (31)(32)(33). To achieve these velocities in passive head thrust DVA testing, quick head rotations were manually imposed in the excitatory direction of each of the 6 semicircular canals by an examiner standing behind the subject, much like in qHIT described above.…”
Section: Vestibular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DVA testing, the subject's visual acuity was measured while sitting 6.5 feet from a monitor that displayed a directional (up, down, left, right) "E" optotype only when head velocity was within 120-180°/s (31)(32)(33). To achieve these velocities in passive head thrust DVA testing, quick head rotations were manually imposed in the excitatory direction of each of the 6 semicircular canals by an examiner standing behind the subject, much like in qHIT described above.…”
Section: Vestibular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head impulse trials including eye blinks, other artifacts, and atypical velocity profiles were excluded from the analysis. aVOR gains were determined by measuring head and eye velocity 20 ms prior to peak head velocity (in order to eliminate quick phases) per trial and then averaging across trials (Schubert et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation of the optotype was randomly generated for each trial. Participants were required to identify the orientation of the optotype within three presentations, for a potential of 165 trials (11×5×3; Schubert et al 2006). The optotype size decreased with increasing level of visual acuity-in steps equivalent to a logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) of 0.1 (Ferris et al 1982).…”
Section: Dynamic Visual Acuity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is explained because they lie in planes approximately 45 degrees to the sagittal plane of the head. Vertical head impulses were delivered by the clinician in the following manner: The patient was seated so that their body faced the target on the wall but with their head turned to be positioned about 35 degrees to the left for testing in the right anterior-left posterior (RALP) plane or 35 degrees to the right for testing the left anterior-right posterior (LARP) plane [4].…”
Section: Verticals Vhitmentioning
confidence: 99%