2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-008-9388-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Adaptation of Parental Care

Abstract: Two models are proposed to simulate population growth of species with mature stage and immature stage in which there are parental cares for immature. It is assumed that the protection of mature to their immature reduces mortality of immature at the cost of reduction of reproduction. Dynamical adaptation of parental care is incorporated into the models, one of which is described with the proportional transition rate from immature to mature (ODE model) and the other one is described with a transition rate from i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those models are constructed with only prey dependent, both monotone and non-monotone functional responses [15,16,20,24,25], both prey and predator dependent functional response like Cowley-Martin type functional response [17], Beddington-DeAngelis type functional response [26,27], Monod-Haldane type functional response [28] and ratio-dependent functional response [20,29]. In 2009, Takeuchi et al studied the dissension along with investing time on taking care of juvenile and searching for food/nutrients of mature prey in absence of direct predation, while they assumed that matures accommodate their parental care time via learning [30]. Krivan (2007) investigated that exchange among foraging and predation based on classical Lotka-Volterra prey-predator system where either prey or predator or both species were adaptive to maximize their independent sturdiness [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those models are constructed with only prey dependent, both monotone and non-monotone functional responses [15,16,20,24,25], both prey and predator dependent functional response like Cowley-Martin type functional response [17], Beddington-DeAngelis type functional response [26,27], Monod-Haldane type functional response [28] and ratio-dependent functional response [20,29]. In 2009, Takeuchi et al studied the dissension along with investing time on taking care of juvenile and searching for food/nutrients of mature prey in absence of direct predation, while they assumed that matures accommodate their parental care time via learning [30]. Krivan (2007) investigated that exchange among foraging and predation based on classical Lotka-Volterra prey-predator system where either prey or predator or both species were adaptive to maximize their independent sturdiness [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those models are constructed with only prey dependent, both monotone and non-monotone functional responses [15,16,20,24,25], both prey and predator dependent functional response like Cowley-Martin type functional response [17], Beddington-DeAngelis type functional response [26,27], Monod-Haldane type functional response [28] and ratio-dependent functional response [20,29]. In 2009, Takeuchi et al studied the dissension along with investing time on taking care of juvenile and searching for food/nutrients of mature prey in absence of direct predation, while they assumed that matures accommodate their parental care time via learning [30]. Krivan (2007) investigated that exchange among foraging and predation based on classical Lotka-Volterra prey-predator system where either prey or predator or both species were adaptive to maximize their independent sturdiness [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective here is to present and analyse an SIR or SI like ODE model for non-smokers, tobacco smokers, and those who smoke e-cigarettes, incorporating peer pressure in the switch from tobacco to e-cigarette smoking. We note that differential equation models have been used extensively in modelling social problems and related issues, including the spread of infections; see, eg, Bissell,7,8 Bissell et al, 9 Buonomo et al, 10 Caiado, 11 Ciarcia et al, 12 Giacobbe and Mulone, 13 Giacobbe et al, 14 Gonzalez et al, 15 Guo et al, 16 Hethcote et al, 17 Huo and Song, 18 Huo and Wang, 19 Jung et al, 20 Mulone and Straughan, 21,22 Mulone et al, 23 Mushanyu et al, 24 Nyabadza et al, 25 Pomeroy, 26 Sharomi and Gumel, 27 Srivastava and Günerhan, 28 Straughan, 29 Takeuchi et al, 30 Usaini et al, 31 Walters, 32 Walters and Kendal, 33 Wang, 34 Wang et al, 35 Wang and Mulone, 36 Wang and Zhao, 37,38 Wang and Zou, 39 and Zhou et al 40 In particular, SIR models and ramifications thereof, such as those involving conformity bias (Walters, 32 Walters and Kendal, 33 and Bissell 8 ), incorporating external information (Buonomo et al 10 and Giacobbe et al 14 ), and allowing for multi-patch models (Wang and Mulone 36 ), have been employed in...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective here is to present and analyse an SIR or SI like ODE model for non‐smokers, tobacco smokers, and those who smoke e‐cigarettes, incorporating peer pressure in the switch from tobacco to e‐cigarette smoking. We note that differential equation models have been used extensively in modelling social problems and related issues, including the spread of infections; see, eg, Bissell, Bissell et al, Buonomo et al, Caiado, Ciarcia et al, Giacobbe and Mulone, Giacobbe et al, Gonzalez et al, Guo et al, Hethcote et al, Huo and Song, Huo and Wang, Jung et al, Mulone and Straughan, Mulone et al, Mushanyu et al, Nyabadza et al, Pomeroy, Sharomi and Gumel, Srivastava and Günerhan, Straughan, Takeuchi et al, Usaini et al, Walters, Walters and Kendal, Wang, Wang et al, Wang and Mulone, Wang and Zhao, Wang and Zou, and Zhou et al …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%